A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science
Oxford University Press, Aug 27, 1998 - Science - 336 pages
Cultural critics say that "science is politics by other means," arguing that the results of scientific inquiry are profoundly shaped by the ideological agendas of powerful elites. They base their claims on historical case studies purporting to show the systematic intrusion of sexist, racist, capitalist, colonialist and/or professional interests into the very content of science. Physicist Alan Sokal recently poked fun at these claims by foisting a sly parody of the genre on the unwitting editors of the cultural studies journal Social Text touching off a still unabated torrent of editorials, articles, and heated classroom and Internet discussion. This hard-hitting collection picks up where Sokal left off. The essayists offer crisp and detailed critiques of case studies offered by the cultural critics as evidence that scientific results tell us more about social context than they do about the natural world. Pulling no punches, they identify numerous crude factual blunders (e.g. that Newton never performed any experiments) and egregious errors of emission, such as the attempt to explain the slow development of fluid dynamics solely in terms of gender bias. Where there are positive aspects of a flawed account, or something to be learned from it, they do not hesitate to say so. Their target is shoddy scholarship. Comprising new essays by distinguished scholars of history, philosophy, and science (including Sokal himself), this book raises a lively debate to a new level of seriousness.
What people are saying - Write a review
A house built on sand: exposing postmodernist myths about scienceUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
This book is the latest and most explosive bomb to be launched in the "science wars." Recently, a cadre of historians and philosophers of science have attempted to deconstruct the scientific process ... Read full review
User Review - Flag as inappropriate
Other editions - View all
Abriola alchemy analysis argue argument atomic augmentis Bacon beliefs biology Boyle Bruno Latour cell claim cold fusion Collins and Pinch constructivist critics critique cultural discussion Einstein's ence epistemic epistemology essay ethnoscience evidence example experimental experiments fact female Feminism feminist Fleischmann and Pons fluid gender gravity waves Gross and Levitt Hayles heat Higher Superstition Hobbes Hobbes's Horgan human ideas intellectual Keller knowledge Latour Lloyd male mathematics mechanics metaphors modern science nature neutron Newtonian Norman Levitt objectivity observer Oxford parity Pearson philosophy of science physicists physics political postcolonial postmodern postmodernist problems quantum rape rationality reason relativism relativist relativity role Sandra Harding science studies Science Wars scientific scientists sexual Shapin and Schaffer Social Text society sociologists sociologists of science sociology Sokal sperm SQIF Strong Programme theory tion truth University Press values Weber's women Y-ray York Yule
Page 12 - To slow down is to set a limit in chaos to which all speeds are subject, so that they form a variable determined as abscissa, at the same time as the limit forms a universal constant that cannot be gone beyond (for example, a maximum degree of contraction). The first functives are therefore the limit and the variable, and reference is a relationship between values of the variable or, more profoundly, the relationship of the variable, as abscissa of speeds, with the limit.