The state and Kurds in Turkey: the question of assimilation
The current literature on the Kurds in Turkey is based on the assumption that since the 19th century the State has attempted to assimilate the Kurds and that this has been the cause of the intermittent "troubles" in Turkey. Metin Heper argues that this theory does not stand up to scrutiny given the many centuries of amicable relations between the State and the Kurds. He suggests that a theory of acculturation rather than assimilation better captures the real nature of State-Kurd interaction in Turkey, by not leaving any part of that interaction unaccounted for.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Tolerance as Acceptance
Distant Though Not Rejected
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Abdulhamid adopted Akcura Alevi Anatolia Ankara Arabs areas Armenians Atatiirk Ataturk Atsız autonomy Bayar Cemal Christians citizens citizenship civic nationalism civil Consequently Constitution cultural nationalism Demirel Dersim developed Diyarbakır eastern ethnic community ethnic group ethnic identity ethnic nationalism ethnic Turks fact forced assimilation Gokalp Halil Inalcık History Ibid Inonii integrated İsmet İsmet İnönü Istanbul Karpat Kemal Kenan Evren Kurdish Kurdish chieftains Kurdish issue Kurdish Question Kurdish rebellions Kurdistan Kurds Kurds in Turkey Kürt Kürtler language latter lived London loyalty military millet Modern Turkey Muslim Muslim elements Namık Kemal nationalist Nationalist Action Party non-Muslims official Ottoman Empire Ozal Party Pasha political Politicization of Islam population present paradigm primary identity Prime Minister provinces rebels region religion religious revolt round of troubles secondary identities Shaikh social southeast Sultan tribes Turanism Turanists Turcomans Türk Turkey's Turkic Turkish Nationalism Turkish Republic University Press Yayınları Young Turks Yusuf Akcura