The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions: International Workshop, Heidelberg, December 17-18, 2007
Rudiger Wolfrum, Ulrike Deutsch
Springer Science & Business Media, Apr 21, 2009 - Law - 128 pages
The European Court of Human Rights is faced with a huge and ev- growing workload. Up until 1998, the Court pronounced only 837 judgments, while it rendered 4. 000 judgments in the last three years alone. On 18 September 2008, the European Court of Human Rights th delivered its 10. 000 judgment; currently, there are some 100. 000 cases pending before the Court. This enormous caseload is both a testimony to the Court’s success and of the considerable threat posed to the eff- tiveness of the protection of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights and its Protocols. Moreover, Protocol No. 14, which was intended to alleviate the problem by - creasing the efficiency of the Court, is still not in force. This publication is intended to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the reforms that are necessary to prevent a failure of the Eu- pean system of human rights protection. It compiles the contributions of a workshop which took place on 17-18 December 2007 at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg and the discussions following the presentations. The c- vening of this workshop was recommended by Christian Tomuschat. The conference brought together academics and practitioners and thus offered an excellent opportunity for the discussion of possible - proaches to the dilemma.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and ...
Rüdiger Wolfrum,Ulrike Deutsch
No preview available - 2009
accepted Article Berlin Heidelberg 2009 Broniowski Bug River certiorari Christian Tomuschat Commission Committee of Ministers Comparative Public Law compensation complaints concerning Council of Europe countries Court of Human decide decision declared inadmissible Deutsch eds discretionary admission procedure domestic remedies ECHR ECtHR effective European Commission European Convention European Court European Union existing fact friendly settlement German Görgülü Grand Chamber human rights idea important individual application Institute for Comparative International Law issue Judge Villiger judgment of principle judicial KFOR large number Law and International lawyers legislation length of proceedings Luzius Wildhaber Max Planck Institute Member ment national level number of applications Overwhelmed by Applications particular parties pending pilot judgment procedure Polakiewicz Poland Possible Solutions Problems and Possible Professor Frowein proposal protection of human Protocol question ratify reasons reform regards Registry Russia situation Strasbourg Court Strasbourg system Supreme Court systemic problem tion Treaty of Lisbon violation Wise Persons Wittling-Vogel Wolfrum workload