The Mirage of a Space between Nature and Nurture
In this powerful critique, the esteemed historian and philosopher of science Evelyn Fox Keller addresses the nature-nurture debates, including the persistent disputes regarding the roles played by genes and the environment in determining individual traits and behavior. Keller is interested in both how an oppositional “versus” came to be inserted between nature and nurture, and how the distinction on which that opposition depends, the idea that nature and nurture are separable, came to be taken for granted. How, she asks, did the illusion of a space between nature and nurture become entrenched in our thinking, and why is it so tenacious? Keller reveals that the assumption that the influences of nature and nurture can be separated is neither timeless nor universal, but rather a notion that emerged in Anglo-American culture in the late nineteenth century. She shows that the seemingly clear-cut nature-nurture debate is riddled with incoherence. It encompasses many disparate questions knitted together into an indissoluble tangle, and it is marked by a chronic ambiguity in language. There is little consensus about the meanings of terms such as nature, nurture, gene, and environment. Keller suggests that contemporary genetics can provide a more appropriate, precise, and useful vocabulary, one that might help put an end to the confusion surrounding the nature-nurture controversy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
a√ected acquired ambiguity analysis answer argue argument behavioral genetics biological causal dynamics causal factors causes chapter claim classical genetics clearly concept Darwin deﬁned deﬁnition developmental di√erence makers di√erent kinds di≈culty Dictionary discussions disease distinction drums e√ect e√orts ences entities environmental epigenetics example fact ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁxed focuses formulation Francis Galton Furthermore Galton genes and environment genetic di√erence genetic variation geneticists genotype hereditary heredity human behavioral identiﬁed importance individual lineages individual traits infer inﬂuences inheritance innate interactions interest Karl Pearson least meaning measures of heritability ment mutations narrow heritability nature and nurture nature-nurture debate noncoding dna notion nucleotides o√er parent to o√spring parse particular particulate phenotypic di√erences phenotypic variance phenylalanine population problem proteins question readers refers reﬂect relative role scientiﬁc scientists sense separate Sesardic slippage speciﬁc statistical technical heritability term heritable tion trait di√erences transmission transmitted understanding variable want to know words writes