Contemporary history on trial: Europe since 1989 and the role of the expert historian

Front Cover
Manchester University Press, 2007 - History - 204 pages
0 Reviews
Is it right for historians to serve as 'expert witnesses' to past events? Since the end of the Cold War, a series of heated and politicised debates across Europe have questioned the 'truth' about painful episodes in the twentieth century. From the Holocaust to Srebrenica, inquiries and fact-finding commissions have become a common device employed by governments to deal with the pressure of public opinion. State sponsored programmes of education and research attempt to encourage a common moral understanding of the lessons we learn from these painful memories. Contemporary historians have increasingly been drawn into these efforts since 1989 - in the courtroom, in the media, on commissions, as advisers. In a series of thoughtful essays, written by leading historians from across Europe, this volume considers the ethics and responsibilities that this new role entails. For anyone concerned with the role of the historian in contemporary society and how we arrive at a public understanding of history, this book is essential reading.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


The responsibility of the historian Peter Mandler
Public uses of history in contemporary Europe
The Bloody Sunday tribunal and the role of the historian

7 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2007)

Harriet Jones is Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Historical Research, University of London. Kjell Ostberg is Professor of History and Research Director at the Swedish Institute of Contemporary History at Sodertorn University College. Nico Randeraad is Lecturer in History and European Studies, Universiteit Maastricht.

Bibliographic information