Justification: Five ViewsJames K. Beilby, Paul Rhodes Eddy "Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" (Rom 5:1). When Paul wrote these words he seemed confident he had made himself clear. But for centuries the Pauline doctrine of justification has been a classic point of interpretation and debate in Christian exegesis and theology. And while in recent decades there have been moments of hopeful convergence among the various traditions of the Western church, the fine print often reveals more facets and distinctions than ever before. This volume focuses on five views of justification and calls on representative proponents to set forth their case and then respond to each other. The five views are: Traditional Reformed (Michael S. Horton) Progressive Reformed (Michael F. Bird) New Perspective (James D. G. Dunn) Deification, or Theosis (Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen) Roman Catholic (Gerald O Collins and Oliver Rafferty) In addition, editors James Beilby, Paul R. Eddy and Steven E. Enderlein provide an extensive introduction to the issues informing this important debate. This distinguished forum of biblical interpreters and theologians offers a lively and informative engagement with the biblical, historical and contemporary understandings of justification. Justification: Five Views is not only a fascinating probe into Paul s meaning, it is also a case book in theological method. |
Contents
| 13 | |
Chapter 2 | 53 |
Chapter 3 | 83 |
Michael F Bird Response | 112 |
James D G Dunn Response | 117 |
VeliMatti Kårkkåinen Response | 122 |
Gerald OCollins SJ Response | 127 |
Chapter 4 | 131 |
Gerald OCollins SJ Response | 215 |
Chapter 6 | 219 |
Michael S Horton Response | 244 |
Michael Bird Response | 249 |
James D G Dunn Response | 254 |
Oliver P Rafferty SJ Response | 258 |
Chapter 7 | 265 |
Michael Horton | 291 |
Michael S Horton Response | 158 |
James D G Dunn Response | 163 |
VeliMatti Kårkkåinen Response | 167 |
Gerald OCollins SJ Response | 171 |
Chapter 5 | 176 |
Michael S Horton Response | 202 |
Michael F Bird Response | 207 |
VeliMatti Kårkkåinen Response | 211 |
Michael Bird | 296 |
James D G Dunn | 301 |
VeliMatti Kårkkåinen | 305 |
Contributors | 309 |
| 310 | |
| 317 | |
Spectrum page | 320 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham Anabaptist argued Augustine basis believers biblical Bird Calvin Christian circumcision condemnation Confession context Council of Trent covenant covenantal nomism debate deification dialogue distinction divine doctrine of justification Downers Grove ecumenical Eerdmans emphasis essay evangelical exegetical faith in Christ Finnish forensic forgiveness of sins Galatians gift God’s gospel grace Grand Rapids historical Holy Spirit Horton human imputation imputed righteousness interpretation InterVarsity Press Israel Iustitia James James D. G. Dunn Jesus Christ Jewish Joint Declaration Judaism justifica justification by faith Kärkkäinen Luther Lutheran Mannermaa school means medieval merit metaphors Michael N. T. Wright O'Collins obedience Orthodox Paul's Pauline penal substitution Perspective on Paul pistis Christou promise Protestant redemption Reformation view resurrection role Roman Catholic salvation sanctification Sanders scholars Scripture Seifrid sinners soteriology teaching on justification Testament theologians theosis tion traditional Reformation trans understanding of justification union with Christ University Press verdict view of justification


