Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe
Governing with Judges elaborates a theory of constitutional politics, the process through which the discursive practices and techniques of constitutional adjudication come to structure the work of governments, parliaments, judges, and administrators. Focusing on the cases of France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the European Union, the book examines the sources and consequences of the pan-European movement to confer constitutional review authority on a new governmental institution, the constitutional court. Detailed case studies illustrate how and to what extent legislative processes have been placed under the influence of constitutional judges. In a growing number of policy domains, these judges function as powerful, adjunct legislators. As constitutional courts have consolidated their position as authoritative interpreters of the constitutional law, and especially of human rights provisions, the work of the judiciary, too, has gradually been constitutionalised. Today, ordinary judges seek to detect violations of the constitution in their application of the various codes, and to rewrite statutes that they deem unconstitutional. Constitutional politics have not only provoked the demise of traditional notions of parliamentary sovereignty, they have organized profound transformations in the very nature of European governance. Stone Sweet argues that constitutional adjudication constructs complex causal linkages between rule systems and normativity, on the one hand, and the strategic behaviour of individuals, on the other. The theory constitutes a novel synthesis of normative and rational approaches to politics. The book also addresses central questions raised by a wide range of ongoing theory projects, including the 'new institutionalism,'rational choice, principal-agent theories of delegation, and the new constitutionalism in Continental legal theory.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abortion abstract review activities adopted annulled apply argued arguments authority behaviour bill binding Chapter Community concrete constitutional courts constitutional judges constitutional law constitutional politics constitutional review constitutional rights constitutionality construction Council decision decision-making direct discussed dispute doctrine EC law effect elections enforceable equal established Europe European example exercise existence extent fact federal formal France French function Further Germany GFCC given human important individuals institutions integration interactions interests interpretation issues Italian Italy judicial judiciary law-making legislative legislature legitimacy less litigation majority means nature normative opposition ordinary organized outcomes parliament parliamentary parties position possess principles problem produced protection provisions question reasoning referred relationship relatively resolve revision rule-making rules scholars social Spain Spanish statute Stone structure supremacy theory tion tional Treaty vote