Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada
In the courts, the best chance for achieving a broad set of rights for gays and lesbians lies with judges who view liberalism as grounded in an expansion of rights rather than a constraint of government activity. At a time when most gay and lesbian politics focuses only on the issue of gay marriage, Courts, Liberalism, and Rights guides readers through a nuanced discussion of liberalism, court rulings on sodomy laws and same-sex marriage, and the comparative progress gays and lesbians have made via the courts in Canada. As debates continue about the ability of courts to affect social change, Jason Pierceson argues that this is possible. He claims that the greatest opportunity for reform via the judiciary exists when a judiciary with broad interpretive powers encounters a political culture that endorses a form of liberalism based on broadly conceived individual rights; not a negative set of rights to be held against the state, but a set of rights that recognizes the inherent dignity and worth of every individual.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
US Federal Courts and Gay Rights A History of Hesitancy
Liberalism and Gay Politics Rights and Their Critics
Toward a Better Liberalism
Sodomy Laws Courts and Liberalism
Lessons from Continued Sodomy Adjudication
Courts and SameSex Marriage in the United States Hawaii and Alaska
Courts and SameSex Marriage in the United States Vermont
Other editions - View all
Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States ...
No preview available - 2005
activists affirmed American Appeals April 25 argued arguments asserted Associated Press Baehr benefits bill Bowers Canada Canadian challenge Charter civil unions communitarian concerns conservative constitutional amendment criminal decision democratic discrimination discussion domestic partnership equal protection favor of same-sex freedom gay and lesbian Gay Marriage gay rights claims groups Hawaii heterosexual high court homosexuality House Ibid individual institution issue judges judicial jurisprudence Justice last accessed April last accessed August last accessed October lawyers legal norms legislative legislature lesbian lesbian and gay libertarian liberty majority marriage licenses Massachusetts moral negative negative freedom opponents percent political culture poll procreation public opinion reflected reform rejected relationship equality repeal Republican right to privacy role Rosenberg Rutland Herald same-sex couples same-sex marriage same-sex marriage litigation Senate sexual minorities sexual orientation social sodomy law state's statute Sullivan Texas U.S. political U.S. Supreme Court United University Press Vermont vote York