The Philosophy of Neo-Noir

Front Cover
Mark Conard
University Press of Kentucky, Jan 5, 2007 - Performing Arts - 222 pages
3 Reviews
Film noir is a classic genre characterized by visual elements such as tilted camera angles, skewed scene compositions, and an interplay between darkness and light. Common motifs include crime and punishment, the upheaval of traditional moral values, and a pessimistic stance on the meaning of life and on the place of humankind in the universe. Spanning the 1940s and 1950s, the classic film noir era saw the release of many of Hollywood’s best-loved studies of shady characters and shadowy underworlds, including Double Indemnity, The Big Sleep, Touch of Evil, and The Maltese Falcon. Neo-noir is a somewhat loosely defined genre of films produced after the classic noir era that display the visual or thematic hallmarks of the noir sensibility. The essays collected in The Philosophy of Neo-Noir explore the philosophical implications of neo-noir touchstones such as Blade Runner, Chinatown, Reservoir Dogs, Memento, and the films of the Coen brothers. Through the lens of philosophy, Mark T. Conard and the contributors examine previously obscure layers of meaning in these challenging films. The contributors also consider these neo-noir films as a means of addressing philosophical questions about guilt, redemption, the essence of human nature, and problems of knowledge, memory and identity. In the neo-noir universe, the lines between right and wrong and good and evil are blurred, and the detective and the criminal frequently mirror each other’s most debilitating personality traits. The neo-noir detective—more antihero than hero—is frequently a morally compromised and spiritually shaken individual whose pursuit of a criminal masks the search for lost or unattainable aspects of the self. Conard argues that the films discussed in The Philosophy of Neo-Noir convey ambiguity, disillusionment, and disorientation more effectively than even the most iconic films of the classic noir era. Able to self-consciously draw upon noir conventions and simultaneously subvert them, neo-noir directors push beyond the earlier genre’s limitations and open new paths of cinematic and philosophical exploration.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

The philosophy of neo-noir

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Much has been written about neo-noir's distinction from classic noir, the continuous presence of the femme fatale, and neo-noir's connection with horror films, but the 13 new essays in this anthology ... Read full review

Review: The Philosophy of Neo-Noir

User Review  - Noah Lustgarten - Goodreads

If you want to learn what neo-noir is all about, read this book. One of the most educational books about film and philosophy ever crafted! Read full review

Contents

Introduction
1
Part I
5
Space Time and Subjectivity in NeoNoir Criticism
7
Blade Runner and Sartre
21
John Locke Personal Identity and Memento
35
Part Two
65
The Murder of Moral Idealism
67
Justice and Moral Corruption in a Simple Plan
83
Part Three
117
The Dark Sublimity of Chinatown
119
The Human Comedy Perpetuates Itself
137
The New Sincerity of NeoNoir
151
Anything Is Possible Here
167
Sunshine Noir
183
Contributors
203
Index
207

Saint Sydney
91
Reservoir Dogs
101

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2007)

Mark T. Conard, assistant professor of philosophy at Marymount Manhattan College in New York City, is the editor or coeditor of many books, including The Philosophy of Film Noir and The Simpsons and Philosophy.

Bibliographic information