Without Good Reason : The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science (Google eBook)
Clarendon Press, Jan 11, 1996 - 306 pages
Are humans rational? Various experiments performed over the last several decades have been interpreted as showing that humans are irrational--we make significant and consistent errors in logical reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, similarity judgements, and risk-assessment, to name a few areas. But can these experiments establish human irrationality, or is it a conceptual truth that humans must be rational, as various philosophers have argued? In this book, Edward Stein offers a clear critical account of this debate about rationality in philosophy and cognitive science. He discusses concepts of rationality--the pictures of rationality that the debate centres on--and assesses the empirical evidence used to argue that humans are irrational. He concludes that the question of human rationality must be answered not conceptually but empirically, using the full resources of an advanced cognitive science. Furthermore, he extends this conclusion to argue that empirical considerations are also relevant to the theory of knowledge--in other words, that epistemology should be naturalized.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
argue bank teller biological evolution brain Cambridge Chapter claim cognitive mechanisms conjunction experiment conjunction principle count discussion diverge empirical evidence evolutionary argument evolutionary epistemology example fact feminist gambler's fallacy grammatical human finitary predicament human rationality human reasoning competence humans are irrational humans are rational inferences innate input interpretation involves irrationality judgements justified Leda Cosmides Linda linguistic competence match the normative modus ponens natural selection naturalized epistemology naturalized picture non-normative principles normative principles norms of reasoning objection particular performance errors petence philosophical picture of rationality plausible principle of charity principles of reasoning problem Psychology question rationality thesis reason in accordance reasoning ability reasoning behaviour reasoning experiments reflective equilibrium account reflective equilibrium argument reflective equilibrium process relevant result rules of logic Section seems selection task self-refuting standard picture Stephen Stich Stich strategy subjects trait true beliefs truth truth-tropic mechanisms view of competence violate the conjunction wide reflective equilibrium