Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives
Peter Machamer, Marcello Pera, Aristides Baltas
Oxford University Press, Apr 20, 2000 - Science - 288 pages
Traditionally it has been thought that scientific controversies can always be resolved on the basis of empirical data. Recently, however, social constructionists have claimed that the outcome of scientific debates is strongly influenced by non-evidential factors such as the rhetorical prowess and professional clout of the participants. This volume of previously unpublished essays by well-known philosophers of science presents historical studies and philosophical analyses that undermine the plausibility of an extreme social constructionist perspective while also indicating the need for a richer and more realistic account of scientific rationality.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
acid adaptationism analysis anthropologists argon argued argument Aristotelian Aristotle atoms background assumptions Bacon body c∆t size criterion Cambridge cannibalism cause Cavendish chapter chemical chemists claim cognitive concept conceptual system consensus convincing debate demonstration Descartes dialectics discovery discussion dispute effect Eldredge empirical endoxa epistemic evidence example experimental experiments explain explanatory Fabri fact factors Galileo Gould Hooke Hooke’s human hypothesis Ibid idea impetus interpretation involved issue Joseph Priestley Kitcher Lavoisier Lavoisier’s Leibniz Lewontin logic London Lord Brouncker mathematical matter means mechanics method motion multiple personality multiple personality disorder nature Newton nitrogen object observed one’s ontology oxygen paleontologists parallelogram rule phenomena philosophy phlogiston phlogiston theory physical chemistry physicists practice Priestley Priestley’s principle problem punctuated equilibria quantum quantum chemistry quantum mechanics quasars question reason refutation rhetoric role rules scientific controversies scientists sense social sociobiology speed theoretical theory tion University Press Wallis