Federalism, the Supreme Court, and the Seventeenth Amendment : the Irony of Constitutional Democracy
Abraham Lincoln worried that the "walls" of the constitution would ultimately be leveled by the "silent artillery of time." His fears materialized with the 1913 ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment, which, by eliminating federalism's structural protection, altered the very nature and meaning of federalism. Ralph A. Rossum's provocative new book considers the forces unleashed by an amendment to install the direct election of U.S. Senators. Far from expecting federalism to be protected by an activist court, the Framers, Rossum argues, expected the constitutional structure, particularly the election of the Senate by state legislatures, to sustain it. In Federalism, the Supreme Court, and the Seventeenth Amendment Rossum challenges the fundamental jurisprudential assumptions about federalism. He also provides a powerful indictment of the controversial federalist decisions recently handed down by an activist U.S. Supreme Court seeking to fill the gap created by the Seventeenth Amendment's ratification and protect the original federal design. Rossum's masterful handling of the development of federalism restores the true significance to an amendment previously consigned to the footnotes of history. It demonstrates how the original federal design has been amended out of existence; the interests of states as states abandoned and federalism left unprotected, both structurally and democratically. It highlights the ultimate irony of constitutional democracy: that an amendment intended to promote democracy, even at the expense of federalism, has been undermined by an activist court intent on protecting federalism, at the expense of democracy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Supreme Court Judicial Activism and the Protection of Federalism
Constitutional Structure Federalism and the Securing of Liberty
How the Framers Protected Federalism
The Senates Protection of Federalism in the First Congress
Marshalls Understanding of the Original Federal Design
Altering the Original Federal Design The Adoption and Ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment
The Supreme Courts Attempts to Protect the Original Federal Design
Other editions - View all
1st Sess 53rd Congress abrogate state sovereign adoption Anti-Federalists argued argument Article Articles of Confederation authority Bank Bill of Rights City of Boerne City ofBoerne Clarke and Hall College Savings Commerce Clause Committee concurrent Cong Congress Congress's power Congressional Record constitutional structure constitutionality Creating the Bill debate declared delegates Democracy Democrat direct election discrimination dissent Documentary History effect electing the Senate election of senators Eleventh Amendment enforce exercise Farrand federal courts federal government Federalist Florida Prepaid Fourteenth Amendment framers Graglia H. J. Res House interests interstate commerce James Madison Judiciary Act jurisdiction Law Review legislative legislatures majority Marshall mode of electing national government opinion original federal design political power to regulate principle prohibited protect federalism question ratification regulate commerce Rehnquist remedy Representative Republican resolution RFRA Scalia Seminole Tribe separation of powers Seventeenth Amendment sovereign immunity sovereignty Supreme Court t]he Tenth Amendment unconstitutional United Veit violate Virginia vote York