"We Have a Duty": The Supreme Court and the Watergate Tapes Litigation
In June of 1972, the Democratic National Party headquarters in Washington, D.C., was the site of one of the most famous burglaries in U.S. history. The abortive Watergate break-in and subsequent cover-up is reexamined in this book from the unique perspective of the Supreme Court judges, who grappled with its political and legal ramifications. Howard Ball presents the litigation in the U.S. vs. Nixon case from the inside out, analyzing the constitutional issues that faced the court and the way in which the justices worked to resolve conflicts, overcome obstacles, and arrive at an institutional opinion. In recounting the tragedy of Watergate from the viewpoint of the judges, the book makes use of a number of important original sources, including interviews and letters from the justices. Perhaps most important in telling this story, though, are the conference notes and docket sheets of the Court members, especially those of Justices William J. Brennan, Jr., and William O. Douglas. To set the Watergate tapes litigation against the proper background, Ball also examines the role of the federal judiciary in the political system, the crucial concept of judicial review, and the Supreme Court's processes and personnel at the time of the litigation. A selected bibliography and comprehensive index conclude the work. As a unique chronicle of the Watergate scandal, this book will be a valuable resource for courses in American history, legal studies, and the Supreme Court, as well as a significant addition to academic, legal, and public libraries.
38 pages matching William in this book
Results 1-3 of 38
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Watergate Scandal Unfolds
The Duty to Hear the Case
4 other sections not shown
American Archibald Cox argued attorney authority Blackmun Bork break-in Brennan Papers brethren brief Burger Court circulated claim Committee Conference Session confidentiality Congress Congressional Quarterly constitutionally based controversy counsel Court majority Court of Appeals decision discussion dissent District Court docket Douglas Papers draft Earl Warren executive privilege expedited federal courts federal judges federal judiciary filed Grand Jury granted H. R. Haldeman Haldeman hear Howard Ball Ibid impeachment involved issue Judge Sirica judgment judicial review July 12 jurisdiction Lacovara Law Review Leon Jaworski Madison Marshall memo ment MTTC Nixon litigation nonjusticiable noted oral argument party petition political question Potter Stewart Powell power of judicial powers concept president Rehnquist Richard Robert Bork Rule 17c Rule 20 Senate separation of powers special prosecutor subpoena tapes tion U.S. Court U.S. Supreme Court United vote Washington Watergate Watergate Tapes White House William writ of certiorari wrote