The Fragile "we": Ethical Implications of Heidegger's Being and Time
Critics have charged that Heidegger's account of authenticity is morally nihilistic, that his fundamental ontology is either egocentric or chauvinistic; and many see Heidegger's turn to Nazism in 1933 as following logically from an indifference, and even hostility, to "otherness" in the premises of his early philosophy.
In The Fragile "We": Ethical Implications of Heidegger's "Being and Time," Lawrence Vogel presents three interpretations of authentic existence--the existentialist, the historicist, and the cosmopolitan--each of which is a plausible version of the personal ideal depicted in Being and Time. He then draws parallels between these interpretations and three moments in the contemporary liberal-communitarian debate over the relationship of the "I" and the "We." His book contributes both to a diagnosis of what there is about Being and Time that invites moral nihilism and to a sense of how fundamental ontology might be recast so that "the other" is accorded an appropriate place in an account of human existence.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accept according allows already anxiety appears appropriate authentic individual awareness basis become Being-in-the-world belongs character choice claims commitments concern condition conscience constituted context COSMOPOLITAN INTERPRETATION criticism cultural Dasein death demand desire determination difference encounter ends essential ethics evil existence existential existentialist experience face fact fails feel finds follow FRAGILE freedom fundamental ontology given gives ground Heidegger Heidegger's heritage historical human ideal imply inauthentic insofar interpretation involve kind leap liberating liberating solicitude limits lives means measure metaphysical moral moral conscience moral responsibility nature never object obligation one's oneself other's particular past person perspective position possibilities practices primordial question radical reading reason relation relationship remains requires respect responsibility rooted sense situation social standard stands structure suggests things tion tradition transcend treat truth ultimately understanding universal values whole