Restoring the Foundations of Epistemic Justification: A Direct Realist and Conceptualist Theory of Foundationalism

Front Cover
Lexington Books, 2006 - Philosophy - 174 pages
Foundationalism, as a theory of justification and knowledge, is often associated with Enlightenment rationality, the Cartesian thirst for certainty, and the modern assumption of the objectivity and universality of reason. Because of these associations, scholars in various fields have disdained foundationalism in favor of some sort of non-foundationalist/post-modern approach to knowledge and justification. This present book is one piece of a much wider conversation that hopes to motivate a renewed look at foundationalism. Of course, the foundationalism on offer has settled down quite a bit from its surly forbears. This more mild-mannered foundationalism suggests that our beliefs about reality can be held with confidence and yet these beliefs remain open to criticism and revision. It is this type of epistemology that provides a constructive basis for investigation and research while nevertheless encouraging a cognitive humility about our claims to possess truth.
 

Contents

The Nature and Value of Epistemic Justification
7
Foundationalism and the Regress Arguments
31
The Given Element of Perceptual Experience
55
BonJours Foundationalism
73
Defending Direct Realism
91
Concepts and the World
117
Restoring the Foundations
139
Bibliography
165
Index
171
About the Author
173
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2006)

Steven Porter is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Theology at Biola University.

Bibliographic information