What robots can and can't be
What Robots Can and Can't Be is a self-contained, rigorous, sustained argument for the unique, two-sided position that: (side one) Al will continue to produce machines with greater and greater capacity to pass stronger and stronger versions of the Turing Test; but that (side two) the 'Person Building Project' (the attempt by cognitive engineers to build a machine which is a person) will inevitably fail. The defense of side two rests in large part on a refutation of the proposition that persons are automata -- a refutation involving an array of issues, from free will to Gödel to introspection to Searle and beyond. The defense of side one brings the reader face to face with Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson as they tackle perhaps their toughest case ('Silver Blaze'); the upshot of this visit with Conan Doyle's duo is an algorithm-sketch for the solving of murder mysteries. Side two also involves a look at the author's mechanical' approach to writing fiction, and the philosophical side of computerized story generation. The volume is peppered with numerous illustrations, all quite professionally done.
24 pages matching psychological in this book
Results 1-3 of 24
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Deductive Machinery
ARGUMENTS PRO DESTROYED
8 other sections not shown
affairs affirm agent dualism agent-causes algorithm Argument from Alvin attack automaton Ax-T behavior brain Bringsjord Busy Beaver Chapter Chinese Room Church-Turing Thesis Churchland CINEWRITE claim Cognitive Engineering Cole compatibilist configuration connectionism connectionist course deductive arguments determined discussion event event-caused example expert system fact false finite automata first-order logic follows formal formula Frame Problem Gigantor given Godel Godelian argument gument Halting Problem Holmes human persons incorrigibilism inference infinite number input intuitive Inwagen iterative agent causation least logic logicist Maudlin mental modal morally responsible mystery neural Norwegians objection per^ut perhaps Person Building Project philosophical physical plausible Pollock possible premise processing proposition psychological question Ralf Ralf's Rapaport readers reason Register machine robot runs Searle seems sensors SHERLOCK Silver Blaze simply solve sort story string Suppose symbol system tape theorem thesis things thought-experiment tion true Turing machine Turing test understands Chinese