Good Reasoning Matters!: A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking
In this second edition of their successful book, the authors introduce over 150 new examples of argumentation from contemporary and ancient sources, ranging from Plato and Aristotle to university student newspapers. This completely revised edition also includes a section which gives sample answers to some of the many exercises found throughout the book.
Many books on reasoning emphasize fallacies, or bad arguments--an emphasis that can promote the jaded attitude that logic is a tool of finding fault with arguments and arguers. This innovative approach to critical thinking emphasizes the construction of good arguments instead. By isolating and focusing on the components of good reasoning, it teaches readers how to reason well and build their own good arguments. Bad arguments are treated as those which violate the criteria governing the good arguments. Analyzing bad arugments in this manner requires time and thought and avoids the hasty application of a fallacy label. Recognizing the importance of rhetorical considerations, this book also moves beyond traditional approaches to logic by introducing readers to the importance and intricacies of audience.
8 pages matching laws of thought in this book
Results 1-3 of 8
What people are saying - Write a review
Reading Between the Lines I
Looking for an Argument
Distinguishing Arguments and NonArguments
15 other sections not shown
abortion acceptable ad hominem advertisement appeal to authority argu arguer argument forms argument from analogy argument from ignorance assess assisted suicide astronauts audience authority believe bias categorical syllogism cause Chapter clusion committed common conditional conjunction consider construct context convince crime criteria critical thinking decide define definition dilemma discourse discussed disjunction establish euthanasia evaluation evidence example express extended argument false following argument forms of argument Globe and Mail hidden premise hominem human identify indicator words intensional definition invalid issue language law of non-contradiction letter main claim Major Exercise means ment morally ordinary particular person premises and conclusion problem proof propositional logic question recognize relevant represent requires rules of inference sample sense sentence simple arguments slippery slope someone specific sub-argument syllogism term things tion true two-wrongs reasoning UA statement unacceptable universal valid Venn diagram wrong