 | Law - 1843 - 498 pages
...838.] Express and Implied Contracts. 9 " As the law will not generally imply a promise, where there is an express promise, so the law will not imply a promise...declaration is repugnant to any implication of a promise.' " This, however, can be true only where there is no legal duty paramount to the will of the party making... | |
 | Jacob D. Wheeler - Common law - 1833 - 646 pages
...not im _ , .,, . ply an w farsons, LJ Ihe law will not imply a promise where there whe'ro'there *s an exPress promise. So the law will not imply a promise of is mi ex any person against his express declaration, because such a decUJjf83 ! laration is repugnant... | |
 | Conway Robinson - Actions and defenses - 1855 - 884 pages
...declaration that the offer is retracted. Routledge v. Grant, 3 C. & P. 267, 14 Eng. Com. Law Rep. 298. The law will not imply a promise of any person against his own express declaration ; it will not imply it when his declaration is repugnant to any implication of a promise. M'hiling... | |
 | Joseph Chitty - Contracts - 1855 - 1120 pages
...Met. 84 ; Phelps v. Townsend, 8 Pick. 392; Huff«. Nickerson, 27 Maine, 106, cited ante, 16, in note. The law will not imply a promise where there was an express promise, nor against the express declarations of the party to be charged, made at the time of the, supposed... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1866 - 716 pages
...refused to pay it. And he relies on the case of \Vhitingv. Sulliuan,7 Mass. 107, where it is said that the law will not imply a promise of any person against...declaration is repugnant to any implication of a promise. Admitting this to be true, as a general rule, it clearly is not true in those cases in which a party... | |
 | Theron Metcalf - Contracts - 1874 - 404 pages
...Britton v. Turner, 6 N. Hamp. 481.(6) " As the law will not generally imply a promise, where there is an express promise, so the law will not imply a promise...express declaration ; because such declaration is repuguant to any implication of a promise." (c) This, however, can be true only where there is no legal... | |
 | Wisconsin. Supreme Court, Abram Daniel Smith, Philip Loring Spooner, Obadiah Milton Conover, Frederic King Conover, Frederick William Arthur, Frderick C. Seibold - Law reports, digests, etc - 1878 - 764 pages
...one in reference to the same matter; for expresswn facit cessare taciturn." 2 Stephen's Com., 112. "The law will not imply a promise where there was an express promise." PARSONS, CJ, in Whiting v. Sullivan, 1 Mass., 107. It is said in Wheeler v. Hall, 41 "Wis., 447, that... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1879 - 912 pages
...one in reference to the same matter ; for expressum facit cessare taciturn." 2 Stephen's Com. 112. " The law will not imply a promise where there was an express promise." PARSONS, CJ, in Wldtlng v. Sullivan. 1 Mass. 107. It is said in Wheeler v. Hull, 41 Wis. 447, that... | |
 | Francis Wharton - Contracts - 1882 - 688 pages
...implied contract where an express contract exists."1 "As the law will not imply a promise, where there is an express promise, so the law will not imply a promise of any person against his express declaration ; becanse such declaration is repugnant to any implication of a promise."2 It is... | |
 | Law - 1886 - 646 pages
...written contract cannot be varied by parol evidence.8 In an old Massachusetts case, Parsons, CJ, said: "As the law will not imply a promise where there was...express promise, so the law will not imply a promise of anyone against 2 Woods Mast, and Servt. 5 66; Bartholomew v. Jackson, 20 Johns. 28. 3 Zerrahn v. Ditson,... | |
| |
As the law will not imply a promise where there was an express promise, so the law will not imply a promise of any person against his own express declaration. 
