What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administrator agent appear applied assignment authority bill of lading bona fide purchaser bonds carrier charge claim collateral common law consignee Constitution contract conveyance corporation court of equity creditors curtesy damages debts decision decree deed defendant Dist doctrine entitled equity estoppel evidence execution executor fact fraud fraudulent heirs held husband injury interest Iowa January 18 judge judgment jurisdiction jury land liability lien March March 23 ment mortgage mortgageor N. J. Eq N. W. Rep negligence notice Ohio owner paid parties payment plaintiff possession principle Probate Court proceedings promissory note purchaser question railroad real estate reason receiver recover rule sect sell sold statute Statute of Frauds suit Supreme Court testator Texas tion trial trust U. S. Cir U. S. Sup United usage valid vendor verdict void wife
Page 211 - that the laws of the several states, except where the Constitution, treaties or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States in cases where they apply.
Page 865 - Where two parties have made a contract which one of them has broken, the damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of such breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally, ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself...
Page 866 - ... such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either arising naturally — ie, according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself — or such as may reasonably be supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time they made the contract, as the probable result of the breach of it.
Page 486 - And when in any suit mentioned in this section there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different states, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the defendants actually interested in such controversy may remove said suit into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district.
Page 783 - ... or where the decision will affect a class of cases, or furnish a precedent for the future action of any executive department in the adjustment of a class of cases, without regard to the amount involved in the particular case, or where any authority, right, privilege, or exemption is claimed or denied under the Constitution of the United States...
Page 908 - There seems no doubt that where there is a positive contract to do a thing, not in itself unlawful, the contractor must perform it or pay damages for not doing it, although in consequence of unforeseen accidents, the performance of his contract has become unexpectedly burdensome or even impossible.
Page 783 - Aliens who are citizens or subjects of any government which accords to citizens of the United States the right to prosecute claims against such government in its courts, shall have the privilege of prosecuting claims against the United States in the Court of Claims, whereof such court, by reason of their subject matter and character, might take jurisdiction.
Page 389 - The power to regulate navigation is the power to prescribe rules in conformity with which navigation must be carried on. It extends to the persons who conduct it, as well as to the instruments used.
Page 661 - In actions of trespass, where the injury has been wanton and malicious, or gross and outrageous, courts permit juries to add to the measured compensation of the plaintiff which he would have been entitled to recover, had the injury been inflicted without design or intention, something further by way of punishment or example, which has sometimes been called "smart money.