Genetics and the Law IIMilunsky, George J. Annas The law is a mandate and a mirror; it both commands and reflects. It should not come as a shock that scientists and physicians often prefer the mirror at times when society seems to be demanding a mandate. This may be especially true in the rapidly advancing field of medical genetics, where recent discoveries leading to potentially startling applications have raised old questions of law in a new light. Nevertheless, we believe that in general the conflict between the law and science, as illustrated in the field of genetics, is embroi dered with exaggeration. The Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Warren Burger, has noted that "the prime function of the law is to protect basic human values--individual human values--sometimes even at the expense of scientific progress"; and that "it is not the function of the law to keep pace with science." While both of these statements are true as far as they go, we believe the law must make an affirmative effort to anticipate scientific developments so that those beneficial to society can be nurtured rather than stultified. It was to nurture cooperation and understanding that we brought together a distinguished faculty of internationally known experts on law and genetics to discuss their fields in 1975. |
Contents
DANGEROUS PRODUCTS POWERS OR IDEAS | 3 |
RESEARCH AND REGULATION | 9 |
ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE CONTROL OF SCIENCE | 19 |
Copyright | |
28 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abortion action adoption agency amniocentesis artificial insemination birth cancer carcinogens cell chemical child chromosomal clinical concept concern constitutional costs counselors damages death decision defects discussion disorders doctors donor dying effects Engl environmental ethical exposure federal fertilization fetal fetus funds genes genetic counseling genetic disease genetic screening harm hazards hospital human Ibid individual infant informed consent injury institutions interest involved issues laboratory legislation liability Massachusetts Medicine mentally retarded Milunsky moral mother mutagens obligations parents patient person physicians plaintiffs pregnancy prenatal diagnosis present principles problems procedure PROF professional protection question reasons recombinant DNA regulation regulatory require responsibility restrictions result risk Saikewicz scientific scientists screening programs social society sperm standards statute sterilization substance Supreme Court Tay-Sachs disease teratogens terminal illness tion tort treatment vitro vitro fertilization wrongful York