Death Penalties: The Supreme Court's Obstacle CourseReplica Books, 2000 - 242 من الصفحات Does the Supreme Court have the authority to deprive the people of the right to govern themselves? Marshaling a convincing array of historical sources. Raoul Berger demonstrates that the Framers withheld such power from the Court and that its death penalty decisions unconstitutionally impose the Justices' morals upon an unwilling people. Copyright © Libri GmbH. All rights reserved. |
من داخل الكتاب
جرّب هذا البحث على كافة المجلدات: inauthor:"Raoul Berger"
النتائج 1-0 من 0
المحتوى
Introduction | 1 |
En Bloc | 10 |
History of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments | 29 |
حقوق النشر | |
10 من الأقسام الأخرى غير ظاهرة
طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات
عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة
39th Congress abolitionist activist adoption Alexander Bickel American appellate Article Bedau Berger G/J Bickel Bill of Rights Black Book Review capital punishment Chief Justice Burger citations cited Civil Rights common law concurring opinion Constitution constitutionality Convention crime criminal cruel and unusual death penalty decision declared Democracy and Distrust discretion discrimination dissenting opinion Eighth Amendment Elliot enforce equal protection Farrand federal Federalist Felix Frankfurter Founders Fourteenth Amendment framers Furman Georgia Globe Granucci Gregg Holmes impeachment imposed infra Chapter intended J. H. Ely John Hart Ely judges judgment judicial review judiciary jurisdiction Justice Brennan Justice Douglas Justice Powell Justices Stewart Law Review legislative legislature liberty limited McGautha meaning ment murder Perry political principle provisions Raoul Berger Ratifiers Senator sentencing Sidney Hook statute suffrage supra Chapter supra note Supreme Court text accompanying note tion tional trial by jury unconstitutional United unusual punishments Weems wrote Zeisel