Quality of care assessment: a comparison of five methods of peer review |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adequacy Adequate Inadequate agreement Ampicillin antacid antibiotic assessing quality asymptomatic audit bacteriuria blood pressure reading chart chronic clinic col/ml condition Cont'd Criteria Statement continued symptoms correlation Creatinine Criteria Statement Judge-Group Cystoscopy Decreased activity developed diagnostic duodenal ulcer dysuria emergency room evaluation exam examination explicit process criteria followceup Fundoscopic gastric ulcer generalists hospital I T X implicit improvable initial LU LU Maalox medical audit medical care process medical record Medicine ment method mg qid month follow-up period obtained outcome data outcome judgment parameters patient outcome patients with urinary peptic ulcer disease physicians positive urine culture Pr-e Present Therapy process and outcome process judgment questionnaire RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROCESS Repeat urine Reserpine ro-e sample selected significant specialists stomach or duodenum study team TABLE tion Total ulcerated lesion unimprovable upper gastrointestinal series urinary tract infection variables X-ray
Bibliographic information
| Title | Quality of care assessment: a comparison of five methods of peer review DHEW publication |
| Authors | Robert Henry Brook, United States. Bureau of Health Services Research and Evaluation |
| Publisher | Bureau of Health Services Research and Evaluation, 1973 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | Jul 30, 2008 |
| Length | 343 pages |
| Subjects | › Medical / Health Care Delivery Medical / Public Health Medical care Peer review Public health |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |