Anchors Against Change: American Opinion Leaders' Beliefs After the Cold War
The end of the Cold War also ended the organizing paradigm of American foreign policy since World War II, containment of Communism. How the attitudes towards American involvement abroad of opinion leaders were affected by the collapse of the Soviet Union is critical in predicting the shape of future American foreign policy. Shoon Murray investigates how American leaders' foreign policy opinions changed once they revised their views about the Soviet Union and explores what this tells us about the sources and structure of their belief system.
The end of the Cold War provides a rare opportunity to explore the causal connection between external circumstances and Americans' belief systems. While it is true that, for Americans, the denouement of the Cold War was a peaceful process, and therefore less shocking and traumatic than some past wars, the event still marked an enormous change within the international environment. If Americans' perceptions about the former Soviet Union did in fact dictate many other foreign policy beliefs then we could expect deep attitudinal change to accompany the end of the Cold War.
Murray argues that the upheavals in the international system had only limited effect on the foreign policy beliefs of American leaders and that opinion leaders have adhered to their old postures about how the United States should conduct itself in the world. Murray explains this continuity by finding a strong relationship between the domestic beliefs of leaders and their orientation toward American activities abroad. Domestic political orientation was a stronger influence on the elite's attitude toward foreign policy than the elite's image of the Soviet Union. Murray suggests that elite political actors apply the same or kindred values to circumstances at home and abroad.
This book will appeal to social scientists interested in studying elite opinion as well as students of the foreign policy process and those interested in the formation of American foreign policy in the post cold war era.
Shoon Kathleen Murray is Assistant Professor of Political Science, School of International Service, American University, Washington, D.C.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
When Did the Cold War End?
Continuity in Opinion Leaders Foreign Policy Postures
The Structure of Opinion Leaders Foreign Policy Beliefs
Intellectual Baggage and the Prospects for Consensus
Construction of the LOP Panel Study
Other editions - View all
1992 in percentages abroad American leaders American opinion leaders arms control basic foreign policy belief systems belief types Berlin Wall CCFR coefficient Cold Cold War conservatives and liberals Conservatives Moderates Liberals constraint cooperative internationalism core values D D D defense spending Differences on Attitudes dimensions domestic beliefs domestic ideological orientations domestic policy Domino Theory elite beliefs expansionist factor factor analysis foreign policy beliefs foreign policy goal foreign policy postures FPLP George Kolt Gorbachev Holsti and Rosenau Ideological Groups important INF Treaty internationalists leadership LOP panel data LOP panel study measure militant and cooperative militant internationalism military force Moderates Liberals Total NATO nonpanel Note nuclear weapons Oberdorfer 1991 panel members panel study Pearson chi-square Peffley percent of conservatives percent of liberals political post-Cold question items questionnaire Reagan Russia scales score Source Soviet Union stances survey threat tions Turnover Table U.S. Congress U.S. foreign policy U.S. military United variables Wittkopf