What people are saying - Write a review
One of the most inaccurate astrological books I've ever read!
Some of the planet's were given to different signs (Mars is given to Sagittarius instead of Aries, etc.). And some of the signs' traits were switched around. For example, Leo the LION is said to be of mostly religious inclination instead of aggressive dominance and defence although it is usually Sagittarius that has a more religious or philosophical mind and Leo that tends to be aggressive and dynamic.
Leo is a LION. Of course Mars will do well in the sign and of course it has aggressive and combative tendencies! And yet this book tried to deny this. In fact, Leo was the ONLY sign in ancient astrology that was considered to be fiercer than Sagittarius who was only half "feral," while Leo was both fully "feral" and "bestial."
I know that Heliocentric Astrology is probably different from the mainstream type, but the signs' symbols and meanings remain the same, and the author didn't seem to know them well enough.
I'm sure there are many other more accurate books of astrology than this one.