Philosophy, Revision, Critique: Rereading Practices in Heidegger, Nietzsche, and Emerson
Philosophers have almost always relegated the topic of revision to the sidelines of their discipline, if they have thought about it at all. This book contends that acts of revision are central and indispensable to the project of philosophizing and that philosophy should be construed essentially as a practice of rereading and rewriting. The book focuses chiefly on Heidegger s highly influential interpretation of Nietzsche, conducted in lectures during the 1930s and 1940s and published in 1961. The author closely analyzes the rhetorical means by which Heidegger repositions Nietzsche s thinking within a broad history of metaphysics, even as Heidegger positions his own reinterpretation as that history s more proper reading.
The author argues that Heidegger s revisionist project recasts the philosophical text as paralipsis, a special kind of ironic statement that when properly received by the philosophical rereader, expresses what the text did not and could not say. The study of such paraliptical revisionism within the philosophical canon offers a new way of understanding the basic historicity of the philosophical text, a text that is critically indistinguishable from its own future history of interpretations. Philosophy itself is revision, a deeply historicist rereading practice, a continuous reappropriation of its own improper textual past.
In addition to being the first book-length published study of Heidegger s interpretation of Nietzsche, the book also examines the work of Hans-Robert Jauss, Harold Bloom, and other critics of revision. In particular, Ralph Waldo Emerson s early essays on history, read both with and against Heidegger s analysis of metaphysics, demonstrate why the historical intervention achieved by revisionist reading is not only a formal and thematic alteration of the past, but also a rhetorical coercion of future interpretive tendencies. No philosophical reader is simply a user or victim of revisionist methods: in rereading philosophical pasts, the reader is the very mechanism by which such interpretive tendencies are first formed into problems or thoughts within the philosophical canon.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Discordance of Art and Truth
The Art of Reading Properly Part
A Rhetoric of Rereading
Revision as History of Being
The Reception of Revision
Rereading in Emerson
Thought for Food Eating Eternal Return
Other editions - View all
aesthetic already Anxiety of Influence apophrades appearance art and truth asserts basic becomes Bloom Bloom's theory calls canon claim concept concordance context critical critique Dasein degger dialectical difference discordance discussion doctrine Ecce Homo Emerson entailed epoche essay essence essential eternal return fact figure fundamental ger's ground Harold Bloom Hegel Hegel's Heidegger writes Heidegger's reading hermeneutical historiography hyperbolic ical influence instance irony Jauss lecture course limitation literary means meta metaphor metaphysics Milton Misreading Nazism Nietz Nietzsche Nietzsche's philosophy Nietzsche's text Nietzsche's thinking Nietzsche's thought original paralipsis paraliptical particular passage perspectival perspective Phenomenology Platonism poem poet poetic poetry polemical political position positivism precisely present prolepsis proper question Quintilian reception relation remains rereading revi revision revision-encounter revisionist rhetorical Rorty sche sche's Seiende Self-Reliance sense sensuous simply specific stance structure synecdoche text's textual thing thinker tion tradition trope true world understanding Western philosophy word Zarathustra