On LibertyFrom the Introduction In his Autobiography, Mill predicts that the essay On Liberty is "likely to survive longer than anything else that I have written." He goes on to say that the essay is the expression of a "single truth: " "the importance, to man and society, of a large variety of types of character, and of giving full freedom to human nature to expand itself in innumerable and conflicting directions." In the essay itself, Mill defines his subject as "the nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual." He defends the absolute freedom of individuals to engage in conduct not harmful to others, and the near-absolute freedom to express and discuss opinions of all kinds. Mill's essay survives, as he had predicted, because his powerful message is still widely rejected by the powerful, and by those who continue to seek power over the lives of others. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
admit affect allowed argument asserted authority believe better Calvinistic cation cerns character Christian common concerns conduct considerable contrary cracy creed custom deny desire despotism discussion doctrine duty enforced error ethics evil example exercise exist experience faculties feelings freedom grounds heretics human impulses individual infallibility intellect interests interference John Knox judgment justify legitimate liberty limit mankind Marcus Aurelius means ment mental mind mode moral nations nature necessary never object offence Parsees party penalties persecution persons political Poor Law Board practical prehension prevent principle profess Protestantism punishment purposes question racter reason received opinion recognised religion religious render require restraint rience rulers rules self-regarding sentiments side sion social social rights social stigma society Socrates strong supposed tendency things thought tical tion toleration true truth unless vidual voluntary associations whole Wilhelm von Humboldt wrong