Reviews

Review: Roots: The 30th Anniversary Edition

Editorial Review - Bookreporter.com

One of the most important books and television series ever to appear, Roots galvanized the nation, and created an extraordinary political, racial, social and cultural dialogue that hadn't been seen since the publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin. The book sold over 1,000,000 copies in the first year, and the miniseries was watched by an astonishing 130,000,000 people. Roots opened up the minds of ... Read full review

User reviews

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

got my copie from the main library

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

AMAZING Book! watch the movie as well. I could read this story over an over. not getting sick of it!

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

I'm doing a project on Alex Haley and this book will definitely be mentioned. Alex Haley was a very good writer and he wondered about something that children would never wonder about.And with that, he wrote a story about it after doing the research.

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

I would like to make a correction to Haley's book. My ancestors were cousins of the Holts from Alamance county. It is true that there was a Holt who had extensive property and commercial interests in Alamance County. He also owned many slaves. His grandfather's land was indeed where the first battle of Patriots and Englishmen was fought years before Lexington and Concord.
Although the Holt family was indeed German, they were not from Pennsylvania as is stated in the book. They were from Virginia. It is well documented that they are descendants of Michael Hold (pronounced Holt in German), who was a member of the Second Germanna Colony who arrived in 1717. This group's ship was hijacked enroot to Pennsylvania by Alexander Spotswood who wished to exploit their mining skills because he mistakenly thought there was gold or silver in the Virginia mountains. The Holts who migrated to North Carolina after their indenture received land grants from the King of England.
 

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

I love this book but the above downplays the plaigarism stating that "a couple of dozen paragraphs"was plaigarized? Try 81 pages, which is the truth. This is a wonderful, mostly fictional (faction) account of the author's family, but it is mostly fictional.

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Haley has written a good book. The previous review says that there has been lot of plagiarism and i wont take sides as i am too lazy to cross check the claims by any of them. It is a good read. Dont read it thinking that Haley is actually narrating his ancestral story. Jus read it as fiction and have a peep into the life of African slaves back in 1800s and also some views on life in Africa. Good read but the talk between slaves is really difficult to understand which actually spans good 400+ pages.
While reading the book I wondered why did Haley put so much effort and details in describing life in Africa and reduced the portion that happened in America. I feel that since he had projected his work as tracing his genealogy, he wanted other African-Americans to feel how their own ancestors were brought and enslaved in America. Even if the events were not real, the book gives us a glimpse of the tortures and atrocities that white men cast on slaves.
Overall a good read - 4/5.
 

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

love this book

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Alex Hailty has admitted that a large section of his book including the plot, main character and scores of whole passages - was lifted from "The African," a 1967 novel by author Hal Courlander.
In
the early 1980s, when Alex Haley, the author of "Roots," was speaking at Lincoln Center, investigative reporter Philip Nobile asked him a straightforward question. Since he had paid Harold Courlander $650,000 in a plagiarism suit, why shouldn't Haley be considered a criminal instead of a hero? Haley had no answer.
But plagiarism is the least of the problems in "Roots." And they would likely have remained largely unknown, had journalist Philip Nobile not undertaken a remarkable study of Haley's private papers shortly before they were auctioned off.
The result was featured in a devastating 1993 cover piece in the Village Voice. It confirmed - from Haley's own notes - earlier claims that the alleged history of the book was a near-total invention.
"Virtually every genealogical claim in Haley's story was false," Nobile has written. None of Haley's early writing contains any reference to his mythic ancestor, "the African" named Kunta Kinte. Indeed, Haley's later notes give his family name
as "Kante," not "Kinte."
And a long-suppressed tape of the famous session in which Haley " found" Kunta Kinte through the recitation of an African "griot" proves that, as BBC producer James Kent noted, "the villagers [were] threatened by members of Haley's party.
These turn out to be senior government officials desperate to ensure that things go
smoothly."
Haley, added Kent, "specifically asks for a story that will fit
his predetermined American narrative."
Historical experts who checked Haley's genealogical research discovered that, as one put it, "Haley got everything wrong in his pre-Civil War lineage and none of his
plantation ancestors existed; 182 pages have no basis in fact."
Given this damning evidence, you'd think Haley's halo would long ago have vanished.
The judge who presided over Haley's plagiarism case admitted that "I did not want to destroy him" and so allowed him to settle quietly - even though, he acknowledged, Haley had repeatedly perjured himself in court.
 

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

the best that i keep on re-reading for my children and their children.

User ratings

5 stars
20
4 stars
4
3 stars
0
2 stars
3
1 star
2

All reviews - 18
3 stars - 0
2 stars - 0
1 star - 1

All reviews - 18

All reviews - 18
Kirkus - 1