Cable Television Law, Volume 2Practising Law Institute, 1994 - Cable television |
Contents
United States v Primestar Partners L P et al 93 Civ | 12 |
INTRODUCTION | 13 |
Monopoly and Relevant | 23 |
Copyright | |
25 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affiliates allegations of paragraph Amended Complaint Americom Services antitrust Attorney cable operator cable programming cable subscribers cable television claims Comcast Corporation Commission competition competitors consent conspiracy Court TV Cox Enterprises DBS Distributor DBS satellite DBS service defendant MSOS defendant TCI Defendants admit Defendants deny Delaware deny the allegations Direct Broadcast Satellite ESPN exclusive contracts exclusive distribution agreement Federal Final Judgment remains form a belief high-power DBS provider information sufficient Ku-band Learning Channel license merger MMDS monopolize MSO defendants multichannel subscription television national video programming non-broadcast television programming partnership plaintiff Primestar Partners prohibit proposed Final Judgment pursuant relevant market repeats and realleges Sherman Act SMATV Southern District Sports Network subscription television programming subsidiary TCI and LMC TCI's Tele-Communications television programming television programming services television service TVRO Viacom Viacom Cable Viacom Inc Viacom K-Band Viacom Services video programming service Vision Satellite Warner Cable York