Faculty priorities reconsidered: rewarding multiple forms of scholarship
No reform effort in American higher education in the last twenty years has been more important than the attempt to enlarge the dominant understanding of the scholarly work of faculty—what counts as scholarship. Faculty Priorities Reconsidered assesses the impact of this widespread initiative to realign the priorities of the American professoriate with the essential missions of the nation's colleges and universities: to redefine faculty roles and restructure reward systems.
Faculty Priorities Reconsidered traces the history of the movement to redefine scholarship. It examines the impact of the 1990 landmark report Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate from The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and the decade-long work of the American Association for Higher Education's Forum on Faculty Roles and Rewards that initiated and sustained much of the work reported on here. The struggles to move beyond narrow definitions of research, to distinguish between scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching while acknowledging the importance of both, to encourage faculty engagement in meeting the scholarly needs of the larger civic community, and to recognize the importance of academic synthesis and integration—all elements of a broader understanding of scholarship—are addressed in this book.
In Faculty Priorities Reconsidered the leading pioneers of the movement reflect on their own work with campuses nationwide and examine concrete issues involved in introducing new perspectives on the different forms of scholarship. In addition, the book contains studies of nine very diverse institutions—Madonna, Albany State, South Dakota State, Kansas State, Portland State, and Arizona State universities, Franklin College, the University of Phoenix, and the University of Colorado School of Medicine. Each study tells a unique story of the struggle to change faculty work and its rewards.
This book offers practical advice to academic leaders considering similar changes and responds to questions for the future about encouraging, supporting, assessing, and rewarding multiple forms of scholarship.
Results 1-3 of 93
The faculty survey included questions that addressed attitudes toward
scholarship, particularly related to Boyer's expanded framework. While 98
percent of the surveyed faculty agreed that the more traditional "discovery of
knowledge" indeed ...
Another is that most faculty members are simply not well informed about changes
in their discipline's view of scholarship. Department heads were asked to
respond to the same questions regarding faculty understanding of Boyer's
Simply performing an extensive literature review to improve the class reading list
is not scholarly work in Boyer's opinion. This is widely misinterpreted. While this
department head was referring to faculty in his department, comments by other ...
What people are saying - Write a review
History and Context
The Four Forms of Scholarship
12 other sections not shown