The European Administrative EliteAlthough there have been other studies of elite administrators in France, Great Britain, Germany, and Russia, John Armstrong has made the first systematic comparison of their roles, especially their inclination to participate in economic development. Drawing on role theory and theories of socialization and recruitment, he analyzes the influences that family, secondary school, specialized university instruction, and in-service experiences have had on administrators. Currents of ideas, class concepts of appropriate role behavior, and organizational peculiarities are also examined as possible influences. |
What people are saying - Write a review
Contents
1 | |
Two The Comparative Method 27 | |
THREE Diffusion of Development Doctrines 47 | |
Four Recruitment and Class Role Models 73 | |
Five The Family and Socialization 93 | |
Six The Structured Adolescent Peer Group | |
SEVEN The Classics Barrier 127 | |
EIGHT Higher Education as Ideology | |
Age Levels of Top Managers About 1950 240 | |
Twelve Territorial Direction and Development Initiative 253 | |
Average | |
THIRTEEN Response to Challenge 275 | |
Major Land Transport Networks 279 | |
FourTEEN Implications of Development Interventionist Role | |
Factors Positively Influencing Development | |
APPENDIx On Quantitative Data 319 | |
Social Origins of German Students in Higher | |
NINE Alternatives in Higher Education 175 | |
Fields of Concentration of Business Executives | |
TEN Induction to Higher Administration | |
ELEVEN Career Patterns and Prospects 229 | |
Great Britain Postindustrial | |
France Preindustrial | |