What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
SinoUS and CrossStrait Relations under the Post911 Strategic Settings
Neoliberal Civilization the War on Terrorism and the Economic Disciplining of Human Rights Convergent Models in the United States and China
The Chinese Response to 911 and the Antiterror Campaign SinoAmerican Relations during Bush I
Xinjiang and the War against Terrorism
Chinas Rise in Southeast Asia after 911 Implications for Japan and the United States
The Dilemmas of Chinas Policies Facing the North Korean Crisis
China and Israel Strange Bedfellows 19482006
Geopolitics Culture and Area Studies In the Aftermath of 911
Chinese Reactions to the September 11th Attack
Young Chinese Look at America after 911 A Poll from Jilin University
An Institutional Response to Crisis in China Antiterrorism and Beyond
Affairs Afghanistan American anti-terrorism April ASEAN Asian attack Beijing Review Beijing's bilateral Bush Administration Bush Doctrine Bush's capital Central Asia challenges Chen Chen Shui-bian China policy Chinese government Cold Cold War cooperation countries crisis management culture diplomatic domestic East Turkistan emergency ethnic foreign policy global human rights important Institute Iraq Islam Israel Israeli January Japan Jiang Zemin leaders leadership liberal major March missile defense Muslims national security neo-liberal North Korea nuclear weapons officials peaceful People's Daily political post-Cold preemption President Bush problem Pyongyang reform regime region relationship response role Russia SARS security interests separatists September 11 Shanghai Sino-US relations social South China Southeast Asia sovereignty Soviet stability strategic Taiwan issue Taliban terrorism terrorist threat trade U.S. military unilateralism United University Press Uygur Wang war on terrorism Washington Wen Jiabao Xinhua News Agency Xinjiang Zhongguo
Page 5 - While the United States will constantly strive to enlist the support of the international community, we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defense by acting preemptively against such terrorists, to prevent them from doing harm against our people and our country; and denying further sponsorship, support, and sanctuary to terrorists by convincing or compelling states to accept their sovereign responsibilities.
Page 4 - We must take the battle to the enemy, disrupt his plans, and confront the worst threats before they emerge. In the world we have entered, the only path to safety is the path of action. And this nation will act..
Page 4 - I will not wait on events, while dangers gather. I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer. The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons.
Page 7 - The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction - and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack. To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States...
Page 5 - Because deterrence may not succeed, and because of the potentially devastating consequences of WMD use against our forces and civilian population, US military forces and appropriate civilian agencies must have the capability to defend against WMD-armed adversaries, including in appropriate cases through preemptive measures. This requires capabilities to detect and destroy an adversary's WMD assets before these weapons are used.
Page 7 - To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively. The United States will not use force in all cases to preempt emerging threats, nor should nations use preemption as a pretext for aggression.