In litigation: do the "haves" still come out ahead?
Marc Galanter’s seminal work, “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead,” is among the most well-cited law review articles of all time. With his distinction between experienced “repeat players” and inexperienced “one shotters” in the U.S. judicial system, Galanter established a clear and predictable model of how the structure of our legal system and one’s frequency of interaction with it influence the outcomes of cases.
This book collects the original paper and ten contemporary articles about Galanter’s theory in a single volume. The articles, which present new research results and synthesize work done over the past few decades, examine the lasting influence and continued importance of this groundbreaking work. In Litigation provides a thorough presentation of the most durable theory explaining litigation and legal participation that sociolegal scholarship has produced.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Why the Haves Come Out Ahead
Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
adjudication administrative advantage agencies ahead American analysis arbitrazh attorneys audit auditor bench trials Chayes civil claims clients compliance corporate Courts of Appeals decisions defendants dispute resolution Edelman effect employees employment enforcement enterprises favor federal FMLA Galanter Galanter's Haynie high-prestige taxpayers ideological igation implementation in-house individuals influence institutional internal interpretation involved issues judges judicial opinions Justice Law & Society Law Review legal services legal system litigation process ment motions to dismiss norms official ordered probit organizational organizations outcomes parties Philippine Supreme Court plaintiff political poverty lawyers Press prestige procedural public interest published judicial published opinions reforms relationship repeat players represent role RRPs rule-changes rule-making opportunities rules settle settlement Sheehan small claims courts social Society Rev Songer strategic success rates suggests summary judgment Supreme Court tion U.S. Supreme Court Univ variable Yale Law Journal