It is sometimes assumed that voting is the central mechanism for political decision-making. The contributors to this volume focus on an alternative mechanism, that is decision by discussion or deliberation. The original contributions include case studies based on historical and current instances of deliberative democracy, normative discussion of the merits of deliberation compared to other models of collective decision-making, and studies of the conditions under which it tends to improve the quality of decisions. This volume is characterized by a realistic approach to the issue of deliberative democracy. Rather than assuming that deliberative democracy is always ideal, the authors critically probe its limits and weaknesses as well as its strengths.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Adam Przeworski advocates of deliberation agency aggregation ancillary risks arguing argument Austen-Smith bargaining beliefs Bicameralism bill bounded rationality Cass Sunstein cheap-talk citizens claims Claro Cohen collective choice collective decisions communication conflicting consensus consider constitution culture debate defend deliberative conception deliberative democracy deliberative view democratic democratic deliberation effect elections Elster equal eration erences essay example expression H. L. A. Hart Habermas Ibid idea impartial incentives individuals institutional interests issues John Rawls Jon Elster Joshua Cohen judgments justify legislator Legitimacy liberty lobbyist majority Manin matters ment Mobil Oil moral motivated NHTSA normative outcomes participants parties political deliberation Political Science preferences principle private information problem procedure proposal public discussion reasonable pluralism regulation relevant religious representatives requires result Riker self-interested sender simply Social Choice social choice theory society speech strategic Sunstein theory tion truth U.S. constitutional voters voting