Debating Climate Ethics
In this volume, Stephen M. Gardiner and David A. Weisbach present arguments for and against the relevance of ethics to global climate policy. Gardiner argues that climate change is fundamentally an ethical issue, since it is an early instance of a distinctive challenge to ethical action (the perfect moral storm), and ethical concerns (such as with justice, rights, political legitimacy, community and humanity's relationship to nature) are at the heart of many of the decisions that need to be made. Consequently, climate policy that ignores ethics is at risk of "solving" the wrong problem, perhaps even to the extreme of endorsing forms of climate extortion. This is especially true of policy based on narrow forms of economic self-interest. By contrast, Weisbach argues that existing ethical theories are not well suited to addressing climate change. As applied to climate change, existing ethical theories suffer from internal logical problems and suggest infeasible strategies. Rather than following failed theories or waiting indefinitely for new and better ones, Weisbach argues that central motivation for climate policy is straightforward: it is in their common interest for people and nations to agree to policies that dramatically reduce emissions to prevent terrible harms.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
agree allocation approach argue atmosphere basic benefits better challenge China claim clean energy climate action climate change blinders Climate Change Justice climate change policy climate ethics Climate Justice climate policy climate sensitivity climate treaty concerns corrective justice costs developing countries developing nations distributive justice economic realists effects emis emissions reductions emit emitters equal per capita Eric Posner especially example extortion feasibility constraints fossil fuel infrastructure fossil fuels future Gardiner goals greenhouse gases harms human infeasible instance institutions interests intergenerational International Paretianism issues Kyoto Protocol limit market CBA mate Moreover obligations one’s past emissions Paul Baer Perfect Moral Storm perfect storm perhaps Peter Singer philosophy political polluted pay Posner and Weisbach problem of climate reason reduce emissions requires responsibility sions Stephen Stephen Gardiner temperature increases theoretical storm theories of justice threat tion trillion tons United utilitarianism values vulnerable wealthy well-being worse zero