Re-covering Modernism: Pulps, Paperbacks, and the Prejudice of Form
That modernist literature was not the exclusive purview of a cultural elite but was available to a mass public via popular magazines and pulp paperbacks, is the subject of David M. Earle's nuanced exploration of the publishing and marketing of modernism. Richly illustrated and accessibly written, Earle's study shows that modernism emerged in a publishing ecosystem that was richer and more complex than has been previously documented.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
academic actual Adventure advertising American appeared artistic aspects attempt audience authors avant-garde become Black canonization chapter circulation consider construction course cover critics cultural decadence definition detective dynamics earlier early economic edition editor elite English studies especially examine example existed extreme fact Faulkner fiction Figure flapper genre girl hand Hemingway Hemingway's hence idea illustrated important influence innate intellectual ironic issue John Joyce Joyce's Keeler later Lawrence least letters likewise literary literature little magazines look marketing mass material means Mencken misogyny modernism modernist movement novel numerous obvious offers paperback plot popular Pound Press printed production published pulp magazines reader reading recent relationship reputation Review rise Robert romance sensational sensationalism short Smart Set social started stories success symbol tensions titles traditional true turn Ulysses visual women writing written wrote