Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1987: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session on H.R. 1158 ... April 22, 29, May 6, 7, 13, and 14, 1987
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987 - Civil rights - 860 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action addition administrative law judge agency agent Amendment American apartment arbitration Association Attorney authority believe bill Chairman City civil rights Commission Committee complaint concern conciliation conduct Congress constitutional Conyers costs Court damages decision Department Development Director discriminatory District Edwards effective enforcement fact Fair Housing Act families with children Federal filed final Government groups hearing housing discrimination Human important individuals involved issue jury kind legislation limited live matter means offer Office opportunity organization party penalties percent person policies practice present problem procedure proceedings protected question race real estate reasonable record relief remedies rent rental respondent result rule Secretary statement statute Subcommittee suit testimony testing Thank tion trial United victims violation Virginia Washington
Page 184 - At the same time there are matters, involving public rights, which may be presented in such form that the judicial power is capable of acting on them, and which are susceptible of judicial determination, but which congress may or may not bring within the cognizance of the courts of the United States, as it may deem proper.
Page 741 - To avoid misconstruction upon so grave a subject, we think it proper to state that we do not consider congress can either withdraw from judicial cognizance any matter which, from its nature, is the subject of a suit at the common law, or in equity, or admiralty ; nor, on the other hand, can it bring under the judicial power a matter which, from its nature, is not a subject for judicial determination.
Page 414 - Congress is drawn in question, and even if a serious doubt of constitutionality is raised, it is a cardinal principle that this Court will first ascertain whether a construction of the statute is fairly possible by which the question may be avoided.
Page 81 - Board shall be of the opinion that any person named in the complaint has engaged in or is engaging in any such unfair labor practice, then the Board shall state its findings of fact and shall issue and cause to be served on such person an order requiring such person to cease and desist from such unfair labor practice, and to take such affirmative action, including reinstatement of employees with or without back pay, as will effectuate the policies of this Act.
Page 185 - The mode of determining matters of this class is completely within congressional control. Congress may reserve to itself the power to decide, may delegate that power to executive officers, or may commit it to judicial tribunals.
Page 183 - Congress creates new statutory "public rights," it may assign their adjudication to an administrative agency with which a jury trial would be incompatible, . without violating the Seventh Amendment's Injunction that jury trial is to be "preserved
Page 186 - ... statute is objected to on the further ground that landlords and tenants are deprived by it of a trial by jury on the right to possession of the land. If the power of the Commission established by the statute to regulate the relation is established, as we think it is, by what we have said, this objection amounts to little. To regulate the relation and to decide the facts affecting it are hardly separable.
Page 146 - To discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions? or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith, because of race, color, religion, or national origin.
Page 81 - ... person to cease and desist from the unlawful practice and to take such affirmative action as in the judgment of the agency will carry out the purposes of this Act.
Page 409 - The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Lumber Co., 200 US 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA ET AL.