The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented Women and GirlsNearly half of all physicians and biologists are females, as are the majority of new psychologists, veterinarians, and dentists, suggesting that women have achieved equality with men in the workforce. But the ranks of professionals in math-intensive careers remain lopsidedly male; up to 93% of tenure-track academic positions in some of the most mathematically-oriented fields are held by men. Three main explanations have been advanced to explain the dearth of women in math-intensive careers, and in The Mathematics of Sex, Stephen J. Ceci and Wendy M. Williams describe and dissect the evidence for each. The first explanation involves innate ability--male brains are physiologically optimized to perform advanced mathematical and spatial operations; the second is that social and cultural biases inhibit females' training and success in mathematical fields; the third alleges that women are less interested in math-intensive careers than are men, preferring people-oriented pursuits. Drawing on research in endocrinology, economics, sociology, education, genetics, and psychology to arrive at their own unique, evidence-based conclusion, the authors argue that the problem is due to certain choices that women (but not men) are compelled to make in our society; that women tend not to favor math-intensive careers for certain reasons, and that sex differences in math and spatial ability cannot adequately explain the scarcity of women in these fields. The Mathematics of Sex represents the first time such a thorough synthesis of data has been carried out to solve the puzzle of women's underrepresentation in math-intensive careers. The result is a readable, engaging account suitable not only for academics in an array of disciplines, but for general readers as well--including educators, science policymakers, parents of daughters, and anyone intellectually curious about a key controversy of our time. |
Contents
| 3 | |
| 16 | |
Environment | 28 |
Biology | 58 |
Chapter 4 Challenges to the environmental position | 79 |
Chapter 5 Challenges to the biological position | 114 |
Chapter 6 Background and trend data | 146 |
Chapter 7 Comparisons across societies cultures and developmental stages | 161 |
Chapter 8 Conclusions and synthesis | 179 |
Chapter 9 What next? Research and policy recommendations | 197 |
Epilogue | 219 |
Notes | 223 |
About the authors | 237 |
| 241 | |
| 261 | |
Other editions - View all
The Mathematics of Sex: How Biology and Society Conspire to Limit Talented ... Stephen J. Ceci,Wendy M. Williams No preview available - 2009 |
Common terms and phrases
academic achievement African American analysis androgen argued average biological brain claims correlation cultural David Lubinski dearth of women differences in math digit ratio distribution effect size ences engineering evidence example explain extreme right tail factors faculty findings Flynn effect full professors gender differences gender gap genetic grades graduate high school hired hormones later Lawrence Summers less levels male advantage male and female male superiority math ability math and science math-intensive careers math-intensive fields math-intensive STEM fields mathematical ability mathematically intensive measures men’s mental rotation ability meta-analysis number of women one’s performance PhDs prenatal psychology Putnam Fellows result role sample SAT-M scores scientific sex differences spatial ability spatial cognition spatial skills STEM careers STEM scientists stereotype threat stereotypes studies success suggest tasks teachers tenure tenure-track testosterone underrepresentation of women University versus women in math-intensive women in STEM women’s underrepresentation