 The fact that an article is manufactured for export To another State does not of itself make it an article of interstate commerce, and the intent of the manufacturer does not determine the time when the article or product passes from the control of the...  Congressional Serial Set - Page 1484Full view - About this book
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 2100 pages
...foreign countries or to other states. This court has already decided that the fact that an article was manufactured for export to another state does not...of Itself make it an article of interstate commerce within the meaning of section 8, art. 1, of the Constitution, and thut rhe intent of the manufacturer... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1903 - 1116 pages
...which commerce is governed, or whenever the transaction is itself a monopoly of commerce. • • * The fact that an article is manufactured for export to another state does not of ifself make it an article of interstate commerce, and the intent of the manufacturer does not determine... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1904 - 906 pages
...ed. p. 329, Sup. Ct. Rep. p. 253) : "Commerce succeeds to manufacture, and is not a part of it. ... The fact that an article is manufactured for export...the control of the state and belongs to commerce." There is nothing in the case of Fairbank v. united States, 181 US 283, 45 L. ed. 8G2, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep.... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1895 - 1088 pages
...way of transit, may be regulated; but this Is because they form part of Interstate trade or commerce. z l} e 3e ~ This was so ruled in Сое v. Errol, 110 US 517, 6 Sup. Ct. 475, In which the question before the... | |
 | West Virginia Bar Association - Bar associations - 1912 - 258 pages
...way transit, may be regulated, but this is because they form part of interstate trade or commerce. The fact that an article is manufactured for export...the control of the state and .belongs to commerce." Thus the Court drew the line of demarcation between the ending of the police power of the state and... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1888 - 1094 pages
...section 8, article 1, of the Constitution, and that the intent of the manufacturer does not determine tbe time when the article or product passes from the control of the State and belongs to commerce. We refer to the case of Ooe v. Errol, 116 U. 8. 517 [29: 715]. In that case certain logs cut at a place... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 860 pages
...foreign countries or toother states. This court has already decided that the fact that an article was manufactured for export to another state does not...of itself make it an article of interstate commerce within the meaning of section 8, art. I, of the constitution, and that the intent of the manufacturer... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 1172 pages
...foreign countries or to other States. This court has already decided that the fact that an article was manufactured for export to another State does not...of itself make it an article of interstate commerce within the meaning of section 8, article 1, of the Constitution, and that the intent of the manufacturer... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1895 - 782 pages
...way of transit, may be regulated, but this is because they form part of interstate trade or commerce. The fact that an article is manufactured for export...the control of the State and belongs to commerce. This was. so ruled in Coe v. Errol, 116 US 517, 525, in which the question before the court was whether... | |
| |
