What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action of debt admitted aforesaid appellants assumpsit attorney authority Bank bill bill of lading capture cargo cause charter charter-party Circuit Court circumstances claim claimant colony commission common law compact constitution contract conveyance corporation counsel Court of Chancery Court of equity creditors Dearborne declaration decree deed defendant delivered demand demurrer District doctrine dollars entitled error evidence executed executors fact fidei possessor forfeiture freight grant heirs Indians intention interest judgment jurisdiction jury Kentucky land laws of Virginia libel lien M'Intosh ment mesne profits Nereyda New-Orleans New-York object opinion owner parties payment person Piankeshaw plaintiff plaintiff in error port possession principle prize promissory note purchase question recover rents and profits rule ship sovereign statute supposed territory testator tion treaty trust United valid Venezuela vessel violation Virginia voyage wager of law William Cochran words Wormley writ
Page 730 - No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, . . . enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, . . .
Page 676 - Illinois, administrator of all and singular the goods and chattels, rights and credits, which were of the said...
Page 586 - Army, shall be considered as a common fund for the use and benefit of such of the United States as have become, or shall become members of the confederation or federal alliance of the said States, Virginia inclusive...
Page 17 - It is no answer, that the acts of Kentucky now in question are regulations of the remedy, and not of the right to the lands. If these acts so change the nature and extent of existing remedies as materially to impair the rights and interests of the owner, they are just as much a violation of the compact as if they overturned his rights and interests.
Page 67 - Upon principle, every statute which takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability, in respect to transactions or considerations already past, must be deemed retrospective.
Page 588 - The existence of this power must negative the existence of any right which may conflict with and control it. An absolute title to lands cannot exist, at the same time, in different persons, or in different governments.
Page 592 - However this restriction may be opposed to natural right, and to the usages of civilized nations, yet, if it be indispensable to that system under which the country has been settled, and be adapted to the actual condition of the two people, it may, perhaps, be supported by reason, and certainly cannot be rejected by courts of justice.
Page 341 - ... office of discount and deposit of the! bank of the United States within that state, to*be collected, in case of refusal?