Contributions to L'Année Sociologique
These reviews, notices, and introductory sections by a major figure in intellectual history represent more than a decade of effort to define and clarify a new form of scientific investigation. Together, they offer a suggestive new picture of Emile Durkheim as "Scholarch" of the "French School" and master of a whole school of social thought.
For fifteen years, Emile Durkheim worked on the journal L'Annee Sociologique—selecting, editing, writing, and shaping the goals and methods of the "French School" of sociology. Now, Durkheim's own contributions to L'Annee are available in English. Classified and explained by Durkheim scholar Yash Nandan, this useful collection clarifies the role of L'Annee Sociologique in the development of scientific sociology; the position of L'Annee in the body of Durkheim's own work and the development of Durkheim's ideas; the importance and function of Durkheim's categories of sociological data; Durkheim's view of contemporaries, including Simmel, Westermarck, Tarde, Glotz, and Steinmetz; the exchange of ideas between historians and the L'Annee group; and the reasons for L'Annee's reputation as a unique publication in the history of sociology.
Professor Nandan has organized this material according to Durkheim's own classification system, with major sections on the concepts and methodologies of general, juridic, and moral sociology, criminal sociology, and the statistics on morals. Subdivisions treat issues in law, suicide, social, political, and domestic organization, juridic and moral systems, the social contexts of crime, the sociology of knowledge, political sociology, social history, and historical sociology.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Editors and Translators Notes
List of Duréheims Contributions Included
History of the Durkheimian School
Members of the Durkheimian School
Other editions - View all
according adoption agnatic Alcan Année sociologique appears become Bouglé causes century character characteristic civil clan collective conception concerned concubinage constituted crime customs divorce doctrine domestic dowry droit Durkheim Durkheimian school Ecole Ecole Normale Supérieure economic Emile Durkheim essential established etcetera evolution existence father feudal French German heir husband ideas individual influence institution interesting juridic kinship L'Année Léon Blum Lucien Lévy-Bruhl marriage married matrimonial matter Mauss method moral moreover Morgengabe Nandan nature necessary Normale Supérieure notion obliged organization origin Paris paternal patria potestas penal law period person phenomena philosophers phratries political practice primitive principle reality reason relations relationship religion religious result Revue role Roman law Rome rubric scientific Simiand social sciences society sociology spouses suicide theory three/3 tion trans wife woman zadruga
Page 3 - I must confess myself sceptical as to its power to do effective work. Frankly, I do not believe in groups of men and women who have each and all their allotted daily task creating a new branch of science. I believe it must be done by some one man who by force of knowledge, of method and of enthusiasm hews out, in rough outline it may be, but decisively, a new block and creates a school to carve out its details.
Page 71 - ... particular. Its function is to place societies in the state of remembering their past ; this is the eminent form of the collective memory. After having distinguished these two conceptions of history, it is necessary to add further that more and more they are destined to become inseparable. There is no opposition between them, but only differences of degree. Scientific history or sociology cannot avoid direct observation of concrete facts and on the other hand national history, history as art,...
Page 71 - ... comparisons are necessary. Similarly, to be able with greater sureness to discover the way in which concrete events of a particular history are linked together, it is good to know the general relations of which these most particular relations are examples and applications. There are not then in reality two distinct disciplines, but two different points of view, which, far from excluding each other mutually presuppose each other. But this is no reason to confuse them and attribute to the one what...