Evaluation of Criminal Responsibility (Google eBook)
Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA. The 19 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular types of evaluation in the criminal, civil and juvenile/family areas. Each volume contains a thorough discussion of the relevant legal and psychological concepts, followed by a step-by-step description of the assessment process from preparing for the evaluation to writing the report and testifying in court. Volumes include the following helpful features: - Boxes that zero in on important information for use in evaluations - Tips for best practice and cautions against common pitfalls - Highlighting of relevant case law and statutes - Separate list of assessment tools for easy reference - Helpful glossary of key terms for the particular topic In making recommendations for best practice, authos consider empirical support, legal relevance, and consistency with ethical and professional standards. These volumes offer invaluable guidance for anyone involved in conducting or using forensic evaluations.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
aboutthe acquittees alleged crime alleged offense American American Psychological Association andthe assessment atthe atthetime attorney BEST PRACTICE Borum bythe clinical cognitive prong collateral committed conclusions conduct considered Court CR evaluations CR reports criminal behavior Criminal Responsibility criteria crossexamination defendant defendant’s ability defendant’s behavior defendant’s mental Defense Standards delusional determine diagnosis diminished capacity discussed discussedin expert explain forensic clinicians forensic evaluators forensic psychiatry forensic psychologists Goldstein Grisso Guidelines Heilbrun impairment individuals insanity defense insanitydefense interview inthe intoxication issue itis jurisdictions legal standard M’Naghten malingering mens rea mental disorder mental illness mental status moral NGRI obtained ofthe alleged ofthe defendant’s onthe Packer paranoid particular police prosecution psychiatric psychiatrists psychological testing psychopathology psychosis questions RCRAS regarding relationship relevant Rogers shouldbe specific substance suchas symptoms testimony thatthe thealleged offense thedefendant thedefendant’s theevaluator theforensic theinsanity timeof timeofthe tobe tothe validity variant volitional prong withthe witness wrongfulness