Tribunals on trial: a study of decision-making under the Mental Health Act 1983
Providing a unique insight into the decision making processes of Mental Health Review Tribunals and of the motivations and aspiriations of the patients and psychiatrists appearing before them, this book assesses the process of decision making from the initial application by a patient, through descriptions of tribunal hearings, to an examination of their deliberations. It uses empirical data from individual cases to explain the inherent limitations of legal safeguards functioning in therapeutic contexts.
76 pages matching argued in this book
Results 1-3 of 76
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Research Setting
The Patients Perspectives
The Responsible Medical Officers
12 other sections not shown
Acheland advice application approach arguably argued assessment behaviour believed Bendene cautious clearly concerned conditional discharge considerations considered context continued detention Court Crown Court danger decision-making depressive illness DHSS diagnosis dilemma ensure example favour felt further given Health Review Tribunal Home Office Home Secretary hostel impact independent individual interviews judges judicial members legal member Lord Belstead Lord Chancellor's Department medical member mental disorder Mental Health Act Mental Health Review mental illness Moreover nature non-restricted offence opinion outcome Peay personality disorder potential present problems procedures psychiatric psychiatrists psychopathic disorder psychotic Queen's Bench Division question reasons release reports representative respect responsibility restricted patients restriction orders risk RMO's role satisfied schizophrenic Secondly secure unit sentence Similarly Special Hospital statutory criteria suffering from mental suffering from psychopathic symptoms therapeutic treatability trial leave tribunal decisions tribunal hearing tribunal members tribunal system tribunal's decision whilst