Thinking from A to Z

Front Cover
Psychology Press, 2000 - Philosophy - 150 pages
3 Reviews
This text aims to give the reader the power to tell a good from a bad argument. Using witty and topical examples, Nigel Warburton provides the reader with the confidence to tell the difference between a Red Herring and a Straw Man. The second edition includes many new entries and updates the whole text. Entries include: catch-22 contraries; counterexample; domino effect; exception that proves the rule; Ockham's Razor paradox; Socratic fallacy that's a value judgement; and truth by adage.

What people are saying - Write a review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - TakeItOrLeaveIt - LibraryThing

really my intro to philosophy when I was 18. complimented an amazing class with amazing discussions that at that time were over my head but well worthy and prevalent to who I would become. Read full review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - HazelD - LibraryThing

A very impressive guide to some philosophical ideas. The A-Z format is both a blessing and a curse: it keeps the whole thing simple, but it also confines some of the ideas when it would be nice if they were extended and discussed a little more. Good for apetite whetting, I think. Read full review

Selected pages


Thinking from A to Z

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

Arguing Well
John Shand
Limited preview - 2000
All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information