Ovid's Art and the Wife of Bath: The Ethics of Erotic Violence

Front Cover
Cornell University Press, 2006 - Literary Criticism - 206 pages

Ovid's Art and the Wife of Bath examines how Ovid's Ars amatoria shaped the erotic discourses of the medieval West. The Ars amatoria circulated in medieval France and England as an authoritative treatise on desire; consequently, the sexualities of the medieval West are haunted by the imperial Roman constructions of desire that emerge from Ovid's text. The Ars amatoria ironically proposes the erotic potential of violence, and this aspect of the Ars proved to be enormously influential. Ovid's discourse on erotic violence provides a script for Heloise's epistolary expression of desire for Abelard. The Roman de la Rose extends the directives of the Ars with a rhetorical flourish and poetic excess that tests the limits of Ovidian irony. While Christine de Pizan critiqued the representations of erotic violence in the Rose, Chaucer appropriates the Ovidian discourse from the Roman de la Rose to construct the Wife of Bath?a female figure that today's readers find uncannily familiar.



Well written and provocative, this book will interest scholars of premodern literature, especially those who work on Medieval English and French, as well as classical, texts. Marilynn Desmond draws on feminist and queer theory, which places Ovid's Art and the Wife of Bath at the cutting edge of debates in gender and sexuality.

 

Contents

Sexual Difference and the Ethics of Erotic Violence
11
Ovids Ars amatoria and the Wounds of Love
35
DominusAncilla Epistolary Rhetoric and Erotic Violence in the Letters of Abelard and Heloise
55
Tote Enclose The Roman de la Rose and the Heterophallic Ethic
73
The Vieille Daunce The Wife of Bath and the Politics of Experience
116
The Querelle de la Rose Erotic Violence and the Ethics of Reading
144
Afterword
165
Abbreviations
167
Notes
169
Index
201
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2006)

Marilynn Desmond is Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Binghamton University. She is the author of Reading Dido: Gender, Textuality, and the Medieval Aeneid; coauthor of Myth, Montage, and Visuality in Late Medieval Manuscript Culture; and editor of Christine de Pizan and the Categories of Difference.

Bibliographic information