The Essential David BohmLee Nichol There are few scientists of the twentieth century whose life's work has created more excitement and controversy than that of physicist David Bohm (1917-1992). For the first time in a single volume, The Essential David Bohm offers a comprehensive overview of Bohm's original works from a non-technical perspective. Including three chapters of previously unpublished material, and a forward by the Dalai Lama, each reading has been selected to highlight some aspect of the implicate order process, and to provide an introduction to one of the most provocative thinkers of our time. |
Contents
Section 1 | |
Section 2 | |
Section 3 | |
Section 4 | |
Section 5 | |
Section 6 | |
Section 7 | |
Section 8 | |
Section 17 | |
Section 18 | |
Section 19 | |
Section 20 | |
Section 21 | |
Section 22 | |
Section 23 | |
Section 24 | |
Section 9 | |
Section 10 | |
Section 11 | |
Section 12 | |
Section 13 | |
Section 14 | |
Section 15 | |
Section 16 | |
Section 25 | |
Section 26 | |
Section 27 | |
Section 28 | |
Section 29 | |
Section 30 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abstract activity actually allthe andthe aspects assumptions aswe atthe aware basic besaid Bohm Yes Bohm’s bythe causal concrete confusion consciousness context creative David Bohm dialogue domain electrons energy enfolded entities environment essential example existence experience explicate feeling fromthe fundamental going happens hologram holomovement holonomy illusion immediate perception implicate order implicateorder individual inthe inthis invariant inwhich isan isin isnot isthat isthe itis kind kindof knowledge matter meaning mechanical mechanistic mind movement nature Nichol notion object observer ofthe ofthis one’s onthe Participant particles perceived physics possible potential problem proprioception qualities quantum mechanical quantum potential quantum theory question reality relationship relatively scientific sense significance somasignificant space structure sucha superimplicate thalamus thatare thatis thatthe theimplicate theory of relativity there’s thewhole things thought threedimensional tobe tosee totality tothe understanding Weber wehave what’s whatis whichis whole withthe words