Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition
Jeffrey Fish, Kirk R. Sanders
Cambridge University Press, May 26, 2011 - History - 267 pages
Epicureanism after the generation of its founders has been characterised as dogmatic, uncreative and static. But this volume brings together work from leading classicists and philosophers that demonstrates the persistent interplay in the school between historical and contemporary influences from outside the school and a commitment to the founders' authority. The interplay begins with Epicurus himself, who made arresting claims of intellectual independence, yet also admitted to taking over important ideas from predecessors, and displayed more receptivity than is usually thought to those of his contemporaries. The same principles of autonomy and openness figure importantly in the three major areas of focus in these essays: theology, politics and the emotions.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
chapter 1 Introduction
on the relationship of authority and autonomy in Epicurus and the Epicurean tradition
chapter 3 Epicurus theological innatism
chapter 4 Epicurus on the gods
what Roman Epicureans were taught about politics
Cicero vs the Herculaneum papyri
chapter 7 Ciceros use and abuse of Epicurean theology
Other editions - View all
Ĺrg according AŽtius angry argues argument Aristotle Armstrong Arrighetti Asmis assumption of harm autodidact belief Cassius Chrysippus Cicero claim cognitive cols concept contrast Cotta criticism desire Diels Diogenes Laertius discussion disposition divine doctrine Dorandi emotions Epicurean Epicurus Erler evil example existence fact fear follows friendship gods happiness Herculaneum Hermarchus human images immortal innate irascible judgement ka™ kind later Epicureans living Lucr Lucretius Menoeceus Metrodorus natural anger necessary Nicasicrates Obbink object one’s opponent’s opponents pain passage passion Phemius Philodemus philosophical Phld Piso Plato pleasure Plutarch political politician position possible premature death prolÍpsis punishment Pythocles question rational reason reference regard relevant Rhetoric Roman Roskam sage Sanders Sedley seems Seneca sense simulacra Sisyphus someone Stoic suggests tšn term thanatology things thumos to” Torquatus tradition translation treatise Tsouna Velleius virtue Wigodsky wise person Zeno of Sidon