Animals, Equality and Democracy
Animals, Equality and Democracy examines the structure of animal protection legislation and finds that it is deeply inequitable, with a tendency to favor those animals the community is most likely to see and engage with. Siobhan O'Sullivan argues that these inequities violate fundamental principle of justice and transparency.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Agricultural Animals animal advocates animal agriculture animal cruelty Animal Ethics Animal Liberation animal protection laws animal protection organisations animal research Animal Revolution Animal Rights animal suffering animal visibility animal welfare laws animal welfare legislation animal’s argues arguments Assistance Animals Assistance Dogs Australian animal protection cage captive animals category of animal Code of Practice Companion Animals Covance Cruelty to Animals direct popular visibility dogs economically productive animals Education Animals equal consideration example external inconsistency factory farms Gaming Animals Garner hens horses humans Ibid interest protection internal legal protection level of visibility London moral mulesing necessary suffering nineteenth century nonhuman animals NSW Prevention number of animals O’Sullivan ofAnimals Peter Singer pit ponies Prevention of Cruelty protection against harm R. D. Ryder rabbit relation Research and Education research facilities rodeos RSPCA Singer South Wales Speciesism Speciesism Oxford Sports and Gaming statutes story Sydney Sydney Morning Herald theorists types of animals