Merely Mortal?: Can You Survive Your Own Death?
"Whether we are to live in a future state . . . is the most important question which can possibly be asked. . . . Yet strange perplexities have been raised about the meaning of that identity or sameness of person, which is implied in the notion of our being now and hereafter. . . ."
These words, written by the Anglican Bishop Joseph Butler, concisely summarize the crux of the problem which renowned philosopher Antony Flew tackles in this profoundly thoughtful book. Despite the perennial hope of life beyond the grave, Flew shows that there are insuperable difficulties in elucidating postmortem survival on a rational basis. He analyzes the three ways that philosophers of the past have attempted to get around these difficulties: the "reconstitutionist way" (miraculous reassembly of our deceased bodies at some future time, such as the Last Judgment); the "way of the astral body" (a sort of duplicate, undetectable "body," which detaches itself from the material body after death); and the "Platonic-Cartesian way"(an incorporeal mind or soul containing a person's identity which lives on after death). The main problem, says Flew, is the impossibility of logically demonstrating how a person surviving death in any imagined altered state could identify him- or herself as the same person who had previously lived a flesh-and-blood life on the Earth. Flew reviews both the classic arguments of Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, and Descartes, as well as the modern findings of parapsychology, elucidating this complex issue with logical rigor and engaging wit.
86 pages matching Merely Mortal? Can You Survive Your Own Death? in this book
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Chapter One Three Ways to Survival
i From Preexistence
ii Attempted Proofs
11 other sections not shown
actually agent answer Antony Flew appears Aquinas argument Aristotelian Aristotle assertion assumptions astral bodies attribute behaviour believe bodily brain Cartesian causal cause Certainly chapter characteristics chiliagon compare Flew conceive concept conclusion consciousness contention continuity corporeal death Descartes disembodied distinction doubt entities epiphenomenalism epiphenomenalist exist experience expression F. W. H. Myers fact flesh and blood fundamental funeral G. E. M. Anscombe Gifford Lectures human Hume identified imagine immaterial immortality incorporeal insist instance intellect kind knowledge Locke logical means mental mind Myth of Er nature never notion objects occur organism parapsychology particular perceptions perhaps personal identity Phaedo philosophers physical necessity Plato Platonic-Cartesian Popper possess possible predicates present presupposes principle problem proposition psi-gamma psi-phenomena psychokinesis question rational reason reidentified remember sense separate Socrates sort soul spirits Strawson substance suggest supposed surely survival Swinburne telepathy Theory of Forms thesis things thought tion true truth word