Bureaucratic Power in Environmental Policy-making: The Comparative Study of the U.S. and Korean Experience in Air Pollution |
Contents
INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOE AND | 41 |
GRAND DESIGN | 58 |
1 | 177 |
Copyright | |
2 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
acid rain actors agenda agenda-setting air pollution policy air pollution programs air quality standards Anne Burford budget CAA amendments CAA and AEPA chapter characteristics Clean Air Act clientele support cohesion Congress developed countries economic development effluent charge emission enforcement environmental movement environmental policy environmental problems environmental protection environmentalists EPA and MOE EPA's evaluation executive expertise external support formulation and implementation formulation process function goals government agencies grand design Heidenheimer impact implementation dynamics implementation process implementing air pollution important industry institutional interest groups intergovernmental relations involved key actors Korea Korean air leadership legislative branch low sulfur containing lower governments mass media Meier ministers MOE's MOHSA National Assembly Nixon Office organization percent policy making process political support pollution control pollution policy formulation pollution policy implementation President Presidential proposal regulation regulatory related ministries role Ruckelshaus Seoul sources strong sulfur containing fuel U.S. Congress U.S. EPA Ulsan