The American and English Railroad Cases: A Collection of All the Railroad Cases in the Courts of Last Resort in America and England
Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson
E. Thompson, 1884 - Railroad law
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident affirmed agent alleged appellant appellee attorney authority bonds brakeman bridge cause of action charge Chicago Circuit Court claim commissioners common law complaint condition construction contract contributory negligence corporation court of equity crossing danger deceased defect defendant in error defendant's demurrer directors duty election employed employees employment engine entitled evidence exercise fact fellow-servant fence foreman ground guilty hand-car held highway injury instruction intestate issued judge judgment jury lease liable Manhattan master ment Metropolitan municipal Nebraska City opinion ordinary Otoe County pany party person petition plaintiff in error Porter Township question R. R. Cas R. R. Co Railroad Co railroad company railway company reason recover damages repair road rule run at large servant statute stockholders street subscription suit supra sustained thereof tion township train trespasser trial trustee verdict vote York
Page 275 - Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict or other decision, or that it is against law; 7. Error in law, occurring at the trial and excepted to by the party making the application.
Page 336 - By reason of the act or omission of any person in the service of the employer done or made in obedience to the rules or byelaws of the employer, or in obedience to particular instructions given by any person delegated with the authority of the employer in that behalf...
Page 587 - That no ex post facto law, nor law impairing the obligation of contracts, or retrospective in its operation, or making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises or immunities, shall be passed by the general assembly.
Page 639 - States, it shall appear to the satisfaction of the said district court, at any time after such suit has been brought or removed thereto, that such suit does not really and substantially involve a dispute or controversy properly within the jurisdiction...
Page 353 - Whether a party is guilty of negligence, or not, is a question of fact for the jury, and not a question of law for the court to decide, when the evidence tends to establish such negligence.
Page 475 - A rule nisi was subsequently obtained by the defendant to set aside the verdict and enter a nonsuit on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence, and no evidence to show that anything in the nature of a trap existed.
Page 132 - Annexed to the declaration was an account of goods sold to Moore. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the plaintiffs, to this court, on appeal, on an agreed statement of facts in substance as follows: The...
Page 327 - An action for relief on the ground of fraud, the cause of action in such case not to be deemed to have accrued until the discovery, by the aggrieved party, of the facts constituting the fraud.
Page 70 - It may sometimes happen that the terms on which a trustee has dealt or attempted to deal with the estate or interests of those for whom he is a trustee, have been as good as could have been obtained from any other person — they may even at the time have been better. But still so inflexible is the rule that no inquiry on that subject is permitted. The English authorities on this head are numerous and uniform.